Search for: "In re Application of Johns" Results 101 - 120 of 6,540
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2008, 7:48 am
In particular, John has long published a series of free downloadable “cheat sheets” for applications such as Amicus Attorney, PC Law, TimeMatters and Worldox - they’re very useful, well-done and a great free service to the legal community. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 7:52 am
Microsoft, 6:08cv331 (Jan. 30, 2009)Judge: John LoveHolding: Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue GRANTEDIt took exactly one month for the first Eastern District venue opinion in a patent case reflecting the Federal Circuit's recent opinion in In re TS Tech to come out, and fortunately for practitioners it provides a thorough analysis of the application of both In re VW II and In re TS Tech to patent cases (in the line of older Eastern… [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 8:49 pm
This week Patent Baristas talked with John LeGuyader, Director of TC 1600 at the U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 9:34 pm
View the article here 01/05/2009 By JOHN CHRISTOFFERSEN Associated Press Writer Some US cities drop criminal-history question from job applications Hoping to prevent convicts from being shut out of the work force, some major U.S. cities are eliminating questions from their job applications that ask whether prospective employees have ever been convicted of a crime. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 3:00 am
One cannot file a geographically-restricted application except via the concurrent use route, and this is not a concurrent use situation.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 1:51 pm
By using a separate will for the closely held companies, there may be significant savings if the will does not need to be probated.In Re Milne Estate, the Court considered wills made by two spouses, John Douglas Milne, and Sheilah Marlyn Milne, who both died on October 2, 2017. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:13 am
We find that JOHN 15:11 PUBLICATIONS as used by Applicant merely provides information about the identified goods, and is not perceived as indicating a single source for Applicant’s print and electronic religious and spiritual publications.The fact that the phrase JOHN 15:11 is displayed in the manner of a trademark does not mean that the public perceives it as a trademark. [read post]