Search for: "In re B. S."
Results 101 - 120
of 28,454
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2024, 10:00 pm
As judges and senior partners are getting ready to go on summer vacation, be sure you’re moving forward with your career (and your tan, if you’re so inclined). [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 3:28 pm
That question was answered in the affirmative by In re Martin B. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 11:37 am
But then s.167 – no re-entry or forfeiture for small amounts, expressly states “long lease” has the meaning given by sections 76 and 77 of this Act, except that a shared ownership lease is a long lease whatever the tenant’s total share, And, of course, forfeiture doesn’t apply to an assured tenancy, as it is expressly ruled out by Housing Act 1988. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 8:58 am
Following Commissioner Gomez’s confirmation, the Democrat-let FCC moved immediately to re-implement net neutrality rules. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
They’re laid out in the Commission’s Seaboard Report and in its Policy Statement Concerning Cooperation by Individuals.[8] They include: self-policing, self-reporting, remediation and, broadly, cooperation. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 7:12 am
Any party so notified may challenge the algorithm's compliance with section (b). [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
En l’espèce, l’appelant ne saurait bénéficier de sa conduite empreinte de mauvaise foi. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:03 pm
Pulaski County Circuit Court, decided today by the Arkansas Supreme Court: Judge Welch presided over a civil action involving whether licensed attorneys in Arkansas are "officers of the court" and thus authorized under Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-73-122(b) to carry firearms in courthouses. [read post]
31 May 2024, 12:02 pm
Whereas the Opposition Division and the Boards of Appeal do not have competence to examine absolute grounds of refusal in opposition proceedings (Conforflex, T-10/03), the possibility of re-opening the examination of absolute grounds for refusal on the EUIPO's own initiative, at any time before the registration of an EUTM, is expressly foreseen by Article 45(3) EUTMR, in conjunction with Article 30 of the EU Commission Delegated Regulation 2018/625 (EUTMDR).Pursuant to… [read post]
31 May 2024, 10:44 am
Adam Prucka, a law student at Columbia, provides a detailed analysis of why he believes the proposed rule exceeds the USPTO’s rulemaking authority under 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2)(A). [read post]
31 May 2024, 9:44 am
This can be a significant downside for spouses who do not want to incur the time and expense associated with re-titling their assets from their existing joint trust to a new CPT. [read post]
31 May 2024, 9:40 am
Basically, the FTC alleged ongoing anticompetitive threats under the Sherman Act, in part, because that facilitated their use of Section 13(b) of the FTC Act to seek injunctive relief. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:29 am
What To Do If You’re Accused Of Marketing E-Cigarettes To Minors in North Texas If you have been accused of marketing E-cigarettes to minors in North Texas, it’s crucial to take immediate and strategic steps to protect your rights and record. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:29 am
What To Do If You’re Accused Of Marketing E-Cigarettes To Minors in North Texas If you have been accused of marketing E-cigarettes to minors in North Texas, it’s crucial to take immediate and strategic steps to protect your rights and record. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:29 am
What To Do If You’re Accused Of Marketing E-Cigarettes To Minors in North Texas If you have been accused of marketing E-cigarettes to minors in North Texas, it’s crucial to take immediate and strategic steps to protect your rights and record. [read post]
31 May 2024, 4:00 am
There’s a new iPad on the market… Do lawyers need it? [read post]
31 May 2024, 3:06 am
Ltd. d/b/a SHEnB Co. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:11 pm
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit’s 2023 decision in In re Cellect, LLC, 81 F.4th 1216 (Fed. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:34 am
The Supreme Court accepted the State’s petitio [read post]
30 May 2024, 6:53 am
Violations of Ontario’s OHSA, among other statutes, are categorized as strict liability offences. [read post]
