Search for: "In re C & C Children" Results 101 - 120 of 1,372
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2010, 3:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The Realities of Bringing and Defending a Lanham Act Case in Federal Court Part 2: Litigating and Proving the CaseThomas C. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:34 pm by Reference Staff
Some of the cases cite to and address the disproportionate impact on children of color in the child welfare system (see In re Dependency of Q.S., 22 Wn. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 6:34 am by umbrella
The post Gelman & Associates’ Client Is Succeeds In Securing Costs appeared first on Gelman & Associates. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 6:34 am by umbrella
The post Gelman & Associates’ Client Is Succeeds In Securing Costs appeared first on Gelman & Associates. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:10 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 3:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday the Court will also hear the appeal of The Christian Institute & Ors v The Lord Advocate (Scotland) – a challenge of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014, Pt 4, which introduces a “named person service” requiring providers of children’s services to make available an identified individual whose general function is to promote, support or safeguard the wellbeing of each child or young person, on behalf of the service… [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 8:19 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Coalition for Responsible Health Policy, its PROJECT COPE: Coalition on Patient Empowerment, and a broad range of other professional and civic organizations including North Texas Healthcare Compliance Association, a founding Board Member and past President of the Alliance for Healthcare Excellence, past Board Member and Board Compliance Committee Chair for the National Kidney Foundation of North Texas; former Board President of the early childhood development intervention agency, The Richardson… [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
Unless Lord Hoffmann is taken at face value, in which case it becomes alright to consider resource issues in relation to ‘reasonably expected to reside’ for the partner of a pregnant woman (189(1)(a)), or a partner or carer of a vulnerable person (189(1)(c)). [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Q: specific children who took advantage of this? [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 12:04 pm
  In re the Marriage of Joy and John R., 2007 WL 2323349 (Cal. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Court must decide whether the approach to ordering costs to be paid by local authorities in care proceedings set out in Re T (Children) [2012] UKSC 36 extends to the costs of appeals from orders made in such proceedings. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 3:13 pm
 They did a D&C to reduce the lining in her uterus to try to reduce the bleeding. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 1:34 pm by Kristin Bergtora Sandvik
”[14] A sustained discussion of digitization and children’s rights only emerged around 2014, as the CRC organized a Day of General Discussion on “Digital media and children’s rights. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:39 am by Julia Kourpas
As parents, children, siblings, and friends, when we choose a facility, we aren’t just selecting the building, but we’re choosing attentive, ethical, and supportive staff. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:26 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]