Search for: "In re Cooper, Petitioner"
Results 101 - 120
of 247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
The Service stated that the May 2015 proposed rule was intended to both comply with the Service’s obligation under section 6 of the ESA to cooperate with the States to the maximum extent possible, and to maximize efficiency in processing listing and re-classification petitions. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
In Cooper v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 5:16 pm
Nor, did the petitioner introduce evidence that the child was in danger that was so immediate and so urgent that his life or safety would have been at imminent risk before an order could be obtained. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 6:06 am
This is a group effort of four attorneys – John Gihon, Marshall Cohen, Roberta Cooper & Bruce Buchanan. 11th Circuit Decisions Gulbalis v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 6:06 am
This is a group effort of four attorneys – John Gihon, Marshall Cohen, Roberta Cooper & Bruce Buchanan. 11th Circuit Decisions Gulbalis v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
SAP, No. 15-1145 (scope of CBM review) Post Grant Admin: Cooper v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 4:02 am
And, here, given the presumed non-cooperation of objecting employers, the government could not know the identities of the women at issue to target them for outreach and education. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 5:32 am
”) (citations omitted); In re Cellular Telephones, 2014 WL 7793690, at *9 (Mag. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am
SAP, No. 15-1145 (scope of CBM review) Post Grant Admin: Cooper v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
This time petitioner Amgen Inc. argues that the Ninth Circuit didn’t take Fifth Third Bancorp seriously and just “re-issued its [previous] opinion with only minor changes. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
In re Sharp 15-646Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
The petitioner in Bernard, who was arrested on suspicion of drunk driving afte [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
The petitioner was subject to mandatory detention pursuant to INA § 236(c). [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:05 am
Initially, Lamar refused to cooperate, failing to even hire an attorney to represent him in the hearings. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
The appellate court first dismissed the SLC’s claims that petitioner failed to exhaust its administrative remedies, despite petitioner’s attendance at the hearing and access to a staff report that indicated the SLC intended to find the land exchange exempt from CEQA. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 7:57 pm
A fact-finding hearing was held with respect to petition C on February 21 and February 22, 2006, resulting in this Court's dismissing the entire petition after Petitioner's case; and the prior order of probation dated January 28, 2005 was continued. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:30 pm
LESSER/European Pressphoto Agency) From today’s decision in In re James v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 3:54 pm
Public Act 099-0090 SB0057 EnrolledLRB099 05449 HEP 25484 b AN ACT concerning civil law. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
It's been almost a year since my last series of posts on the fallout from Hobby Lobby--in particular, on the challenges by nonprofit organizations to the government's augmented religious accommodation. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:25 am
All unnamed movants are relieved of any duty to cooperate further with the investigation. [read post]
