Search for: "In re Interest of Edward B." Results 101 - 120 of 364
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2007, 12:56 am
Stimulation of the mind or emotions to a high level of feeling or activity. b. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:35 am
Haas, Hunton & Williams LLP, on Tuesday, February 21, 2017 Tags: Appraisal rights, Business judgment rule, Conflicts of interest, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Fairness review, Fiduciary duties, In re Trulia, Institutional Investors, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions The Activist Investing Annual Review 2017 Posted by Josh Black, Activist Insight, on Tuesday, February 21, 2017 Tags: Boards of Directors, Hedge funds, International governance, Mergers &… [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Edward [2001] 2 S.C.R. 1014, at para. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 9:58 am
  A thought leader would be proposing (a) how to re-engineer the civil justice in a way that reduces costs and improves access, or (b) how to anticipate and avoid legal disputes through systems that keep clients out of a broken civil justice system. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 1:09 pm
It'll be interesting to see (a) whether that's true, and (b) whether that point gets much play in the media if the Clintons do very well tomorrow. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 1:26 am
"One thing is clear," said Joseph Cotchett, a John Edwards supporter. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:46 am by husovec
The law in question includes no mention of such systems or re-use of data and consequently offers no safeguards. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 4:01 am by SHG
(b) The horn shall not otherwise be used, except as a theft alarm system. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 9:18 am by Intelligent Challenge
When working as an in-house counsel, when problems arose I was much less interested in pointing fingers, and more interested in sorting out the consequences quickly and effectively, working out how the problem arose (the framework in the book “Difficult Conversations” calls this assessing “contribution”) and then making sure we (collectively) avoided a re-run. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:24 pm
Question (b) was also dealt with quite shortly. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
The Yaxley assimilation line (which goes back to Re Basham and Grant v Edwards [1986] Ch 638 and Rosset [1991] 1 AC 107) just doesn’t wash conceptually any more, and particularly not after Lord Walker’s disavowal of the analogy between them in Thorner (which, as a footnote, is rather odd, because he is the common link between all three cases). [read post]