Search for: "In re Investigation into General Order No. 45" Results 101 - 120 of 543
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2020, 4:14 pm by John Jascob
Some of these same regulators have followed-up that relief with their own COVID-19 webpages and courts have begun to re-work their upcoming schedules in order to protect court personnel, litigants, and the public. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 6:46 am by Elena Chachko
The Regularization Law does not overturn the Ofra court order, nor can it re-build Amona. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 11:30 pm by Alexandre Lodie
This judgment from the General Court is in line with  case SRB v EDPS discussed here (see also Spajic) where the General Court held that although when data could be considered as pseudonymised (and thus personal data according to the EDPS) one had to consider whether the recipient of that data could (reasonably and lawfully) get the additional information needed to re-identify them in order to qualify data as personal. [read post]
1 May 2015, 8:58 am by WIMS
Michigan News <> Attorney General v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 3:26 pm by Greg Lambert
Vincent AI then generates a legal memorandum summarizing the relevant law. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:21 am by Yvonne Daly
However, on appeal by the State, the Supreme Court ordered his re-arrest and upheld the validity of his original conviction. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 7:09 pm by Prashant Reddy
In less than 45 days, the Ministry over-ruled the DCGI’s expert opinion by issuing an interim stay and permitting Natco to market the drug. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 3:37 am by Greg Lambert
US Attorney General Merrick Garland laid out some new standards for the FBI to use in order to confiscate journalist’s information. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 9:23 am by Russell Knight
” In re Estate of Pellico, 916 NE 2d 45 – Ill: Appellate Court, 2nd Dist. 2009 “The fact that a party appears pro se does not relieve that party from complying as nearly as possible to the Illinois Supreme Court Rules for practice before this court” Voris v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 7:08 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The rest were either supervisor referrals (305) or not deemed sufficient to investigate. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 4:44 pm
&nbsp; Last year, the US Supreme Court handed a victory to patent-reform advocates when it ruled that MercExchange was not automatically entitled to a court order blocking the offending service. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 10:56 am by Camille Ochoa and Dave Maass
What’s worse: If you’re an adult on the list, you have no right to know you’re on it or to challenge your inclusion. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 12:56 pm by Giles Peaker
Appeal allowed and the matter remitted to the County Court with the article 8 defence re-instated. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:54 am
’ The lead investigator, Detective Sergeant Bruce Edwards, testified that Past Times' electronic games used a pre-reveal system. [read post]