Search for: "In re Jackson"
Results 101 - 120
of 4,410
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 12:50 pm
Jackson made her point even more clearly a few minutes later, telling Sridharan that “what I’m a little concerned about is that really your argument is just boiling down to we think we have a meritorious claim and we don’t want to have to follow the law while we’re challenging it. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 3:09 pm
If Chevron were reversed, how does that affect what you're talking about here? [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:55 am
This Article argues that diversity’s proponents can deploy “ideological jujitsu” to re-purpose their opponents’ prior claims. [read post]
SCOTUS Repeated Relisting of a Case on the Meaning of Race Neutrality--and a Plug for my new Article
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Since then it has been re-listed half a dozen times, including for the conference on Friday of last week. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:12 am
We’re not done with the stupid wagon yet. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Chicago 1927 p, 151. [11] E.g., Re Schweppes Ltd [1914] Ch 322. [12] Armen Alchian – Harold Demsetz, op.cit. p. 787. [13] See, e.g., Robert C. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
This post and the next are follow-ups to my collection of posts on Trump v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:31 am
” Neither Iglesias nor Jackson are mad at Newsom, even if they’re surprised that this highly publicized arrangement is over so quickly. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Jill Lepore Oliver Wendell Holmes was born in 1841, when Andrew Jackson was president. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
“You might think they’re frivolous, but the people who are bringing them may not think they’re frivolous. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
The most striking justice in this regard, of course, was Jackson, acidly skeptical of applying Section 3 in this case. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Justice Jackson, for example, emphasized the difference between the language in Section 11 of the Securities Act and the language in Rule 10b-5, opining: “When you’re required to state something and you don’t state it, Section 11 says there’s liability. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
" The second installment focused on Justice Jackson's colloquies about "Office under the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
" The second installment focused on Justice Jackson's colloquies about "Office under the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
" Mitchell insisted, "No, we're not giving it up at all. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
(I will address that issue in a future post about Justice Jackson's colloquies). [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
A 19th Century Supreme Court case, In Re. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:00 pm
I guess my question is why the Framers would have designed a system that would -- could result in interim disuniformity in this way where we have elections pending and different states suddenly saying you're eligible, you're not, on the basis of this kind of thing? [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 11:04 am
Justice Jackson, for example, emphasized the difference between the language in Section 11 of the Securities Act and the language in Rule 10b-5, opining: “When you’re required to state something and you don’t state it, Section 11 says there’s liability. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:08 am
We’re not asking; we’re telling you. [read post]
