Search for: "In re John F. (1983)" Results 101 - 120 of 166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
As noted above, the courts have routinely found the victim depicted was harmed by the offender’s possession of the images depicting their abuse.16 Despite the consistency among the courts in finding harm to the victims, the courts have split on whether, and how much restitution to award the victims depicted in the imagery; amounts vary between full restitution,17 de minimus restitution,18 and no restitution.19 The difference in outcome turns on the courts’ causation… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
§1983 (“section 1983”),[4] and, for that matter, the Fourteenth Amendment’s “state action” requirement.[5] The Court framed the issue before it as a choice between two competing standards. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 10:45 am by Mark Ashton
You order the child to be re-instated to the cheerleading squad. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:25 pm by Daniel Hemel
That storyline might not seem surprising to commentators who charge that the court under Chief Justice John Roberts is unusually friendly to business and hostile to workers. [read post]
3 Oct 2006, 2:01 pm
Res-Care, Inc., 705 F.2d 1461, 1465 (7th Cir. 1983) (opinion by Circuit Judge Posner)].In the view of the dissenting Board members, the Board has failed yet again:If the National Labor Relations Act required this result — if Congress intended to define supervisors in a way that swept in large numbers of professionals and other workers without true managerial prerogatives—then the Board would be dutybound to apply the statute that way. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
It then draws on this examination to re-cast the project of human rights legalities as a semiotic contestation—a system of interpenetration centered in law but structurally coupled with globalization and governance. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
HCJ) In Canadian case law, two Modern philosophers–specifically, two Utilitarians–John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham, are overwhelmingly the most cited. [read post]