Search for: "In re Kellogg" Results 101 - 120 of 344
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2017, 6:05 am by Joe Patrice
[American Lawyer] * Kellogg Huber is now Kellogg Hansen for those keeping score at home. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 10:00 pm by Laura Mushrush
“Let’s say you’re worried about allergen control and you’re handing something in a truck that had hauled peanuts before. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 8:41 am by Eric Goldman
No preliminary injunction against Yelp for the phrase “We Know Just the Place” * In re Lenovo Adware Litigation, 2016 WL 6277245 (N.D. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 7:09 pm by Ron Coleman
The boxes in the pile on the left feature the Kellogg’s logo. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
., a subsidiary of Kellogg, and Clean Green Textile Service, as reported in Where Do the Poor and Middle Class Line Up for This Tax Break Parade? [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:46 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 “Considering how intertwined ‘likelihood of confusion’ is with the other claims, it cannot be ruled that B&B waived or is estopped from re-litigating the other claims when it explicitly argued that such an important element was improperly decided. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:23 pm by Alex Loomis
., Judge Krause’s concurrence in In re One2One Communications, LLC). [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 8:56 am by Ruth Carter
Screw you Kellogg’s and General Mills. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 1:44 pm by Alex R. McQuade
Today, President Obama met with Cuban President Raul Castro as part of an historic visit to Cuba as the two countries revitalize diplomatic relations. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm by Stuart Altman and Michelle Kisloff
Although the Target court does not explicitly state so, it appears to follow the “substantial purpose” version of the “primary purpose” test used by the court in In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F. 3d 754 (D.C. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm by Stuart Altman and Michelle Kisloff
Although the Target court does not explicitly state so, it appears to follow the “substantial purpose” version of the “primary purpose” test used by the court in In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F. 3d 754 (D.C. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 8:14 am by Beth Graham
See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, 166 S.W.3d at 737; ABB Kraftwerke Aktiengesellschaft, 115 S.W.3d 287 at 291. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supp. 3d 521 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) (applying Upjohn to protect internal investigation records, including witnesses communications); In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754 (D.C. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 8:12 am by Joy Waltemath
The court granted the motion for mandamus (In re: Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., August 11, 2015, Wilkins, R.). [read post]