Search for: "In re Marriage of Powers (1990)" Results 101 - 120 of 126
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2011, 7:12 am by Joel R. Brandes
The parties were married in Massachusetts on March 25, 1990 and had three unemancipated children of the marriage. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:22 am by Joel R. Brandes
The parties were married in Massachusetts on March 25, 1990 and had three unemancipated children of the marriage. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:19 am by The Editors
We began our paperless client files in the 1990s and completely phased out paper by the turn of the millennium. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
In 1990 Arturas and Edita Bakanovas emigrated from Lithuania to Israel and became Israeli citizens. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
(citing In re Marriage of Walton, 28 Cal.App.3d 108, 117 [1972]; Joy v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am by Dave
  Yes the Secretary of State has a power to include other forms of ill-treatment falling short of actual violence within s 177(1), but that had not been done because the SoS already believed that the word bore that wider meaning. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 12:08 pm by Sudeshna Dutta
If you're looking for causal explanations, there are a lot of them. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm by admin
Will) without needing to re-write the whole thing. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am by The Legal Blog
The law was conceived and put in place by a colonial power. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
A number of important recent decisions have re-emphasised the principle of open justice. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:27 am by Transplanted Lawyer
DHHS, be anxious to take as expansive a reading of Federal power as they can so as to justify the Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:59 am by John E. Harding, JD, CFLS
  (In re Marriage of Witherspoon (2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 963, 971 [in Convention matters, we review factual findings for clear error and legal conclusions de novo].) [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 1:09 pm by Hull & Hull LLP
  Some of the key facts are that the deceased had a long-time, first marriage. [read post]