Search for: "In re Phoenix F."
Results 101 - 120
of 136
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Weed (Phoenix, AZ)Cartoon Networks v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
See In re Heath, 182 B. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:34 am
The reason you're limited to the State of Arizona exemptions (and a couple of others) is that Arizona is what's called an "opt-out" state, because it did. [read post]
22 May 2010, 6:55 am
”); see In re Dumont, 581 F.3d at 1108.[7] In re Dumont, 581 F.3d at 1107.[8] Id. at 1108. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:34 am
(b) The filing of a petition under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title, or of an application under section 5(a)(3) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, does not operate as a stay—(1) under subsection (a) of this section, of the commencement or continuation of a criminal action or proceeding against the debtor;(2) under subsection (a)—(A) of the commencement or continuation of a civil action or proceeding—(i) for the establishment of paternity;(ii) for the… [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
For example, the Phoenix Coyotes would like to sell their franchise through a bankruptcy proceeding. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:25 pm
I am not a Phoenix, rising out of the system. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 11:12 am
Schriro, __ F.3d __, 2010 WL 653441 (9th Cir. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 5:51 am
Talk to the small business in Phoenix that will triple its work force because of the Recovery Act. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:25 pm
Talk to the small business in Phoenix that will triple its workforce because of the Recovery Act. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
December 7, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
Federal Court Sends Franchisee-Franchisor Trade Secret and Breach of Contract Dispute To Arbitration
15 Sep 2009, 11:55 am
., 207 F.3d 1126, 1131 (9th Cir. 2000)). [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
: TTAB says STEAM N’ MASH merely descriptive of process potatoes: In re ProMark Brands Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) WYHA? [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 7:39 am
Phoenix Bond & Indem. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:05 pm
To make me pay forThe harm in entirety2Girl, the court's gonna findthat you're a little bit wrongand I'm a little bit rightAnd I say girl! [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:35 am
Ruff, 535 F.3d 999 (9th Cir. 2008). [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:16 pm
(In re Rawson Food Service, Inc.), 846 F.2d 1343, 1349 (11th Cir.1988) (recognizing that a defense which points out a defect in the plaintiff's prima facie case is not an affirmative defense); Zivkovic v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:23 am
Police Commissioner Edward F. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 7:35 pm
The most relevant case for this legal analysis is In Re DuPont In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 12:11 am
While I will miss f/k/a, this is no Requiem for a Heavyweight, but Phoenix Rising. [read post]
