Search for: "In re Pohl"
Results 101 - 120
of 226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2016, 2:29 pm
James Pohl. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 10:51 am
Academic and research integrity process is a messy one and, as we’re seeing here, one that increasingly lands before courts of law. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 8:51 am
But that strikes Judge Pohl as the mail issue, which is set for discussion later; we’re interested now in monitoring. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 2:45 pm
A word or three more (about Rule 505(h) and (g) arcana, which we’ll mercifully excise), and we’re done. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:09 am
You’re kind of aware of where those lines are. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 9:09 am
Judge Pohl again squints. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:50 pm
Well, then, I guess you’re fine with a prisoner’s execution, provided his lawyer performed in a constitutionally adequate way? [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 2:34 pm
If you’re looking to catch up on the battle of Fallujah, Al Jazeera features an interactive timeline detailing the offensive. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:50 pm
We’re back. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:48 am
One might be hard-pressed to find it in this economy, unless of course you're a bankruptcy lawyer. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 10:59 am
Miriam Pohl: The Recast of Brussels I – striking the balance between trust and control Roughly two years after the presentation of the Commission’s proposal, the recast of the Brussels I Regulation was adopted on 6 December 2012. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 6:30 am
If you want to drive your Flintstones car in Germany, you're going to have to choose between safety and authenticity. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:19 am
No, this issue isn’t ripe, as we’re a good ways off from trial, and even a longer way off from any sentencing. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm
The court, we’re pleased to say, got it precisely right. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 1:33 pm
This last bit is apparently illuminating for Judge Pohl. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:35 am
These prompt the court to re-jigger a bit. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 10:21 am
Judge Pohl stops him and cites two barriers to the defense’s request. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 5:06 am
They’re not licensed! [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 8:20 am
Harrington asked about what Parrella had told others about the job, but Parrella sustained an asked-and-answered objection and said, “We’re not going to go there” when Harrington asked if Parrella was planning to talk to Pohl about the case. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:35 pm
And we’re back, after a trifling 18-month delay, a lot of litigation, and a major D.C. [read post]
