Search for: "In re Pohl"
Results 101 - 120
of 226
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2014, 7:31 am
We’re talking big-time unfairness here, your honor. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 1:57 pm
None of this impresses Judge Pohl. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 1:40 pm
Judge Pohl: you’re relying on Hamdan II? [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 11:46 am
Aaaaand we’re back. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 9:02 am
We’re in lunch recess until 1300. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:31 am
At any rate, we’re in recess until Wednesday at 0900. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 5:58 am
Three of the 2(e)(5) decisions were precedential: black floral packaging in In re Florists’ Transworld Delivery, Inc., 106 USPQ2d 1784 (TTAB 2013) [TTABlogged here]; peppermint flavor for nitroglycerin in In re Pohl-Boskamp GmbH & Co. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 1:08 pm
The key issues in In re Pohl-Boskamp GmbH & Co., centered around whether the mark functioned as a trademark and whether peppermint affected the quality of the product. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 8:31 am
Pohl has ordered that al Shibh is to receive a mental health evaluation before the case can continue. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:50 pm
We’re back. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:39 pm
Second in our re-direct sequence is KSM lawyer David Nevin. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 2:28 pm
We’re in recess until tomorrow. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:47 am
” But, Bin Al Shibh goes, on Judge Pohl is a war criminal. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:35 am
These prompt the court to re-jigger a bit. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 11:19 am
We’re back from lunch. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 11:56 am
Will he have any re-direct? [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 9:35 am
And … we’re back. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 7:23 am
Judge Pohl asks: is there any written standard operating procedure for bin searches? [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 9:00 am
At least Congress’s doors are open, right (even if they’re just talking about the shutdown, rather than ending it)? [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 7:08 am
Pohl. [read post]
