Search for: "In re R.C."
Results 101 - 120
of 300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
In re Civil Commitment of G.X.R., No. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:05 pm
The Adam Walsh Act, also known as R.C. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:35 am
In re Kelleher, 2009-Ohio-2960 (7th Dist.) [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:49 am
Merit Decision Executive Summary: Four Years and You’re Out! [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:14 pm
Mcelyea, No. 07-0754, from Austin (3rd COA) R.C. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:47 am
If you’re like me, you’re saying “what continuance? [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 8:25 am
The balancing test is now codified at R.C. 2505.02(A)(2).) [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:30 am
Pryor appealed the re-determination, and a hearing was held before a hearing officer. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:35 am
”) In re Nowak, 2004-Ohio-6777 (“[t]he proposition that the one-subject rule is both directory and potentially capable of being applied by the court to invalidate a law is essentially an oxymoron. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
On August 16, 2006, Riffle was indicted on one count of rape of a victim under the age of thirteen years in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b), a felony of the first degree. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 12:32 pm
Sometime before the divorce hearing, Sean re-upped for another six years. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 9:49 am
The two key statutory provisions that allow a court to consider youth a factor in sentencing are R.C. 2929.11 and R.C. 29292.12. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:00 am
ODNR regulatory news:NOTICE TO WELL OWNERS re: tubular goods (3/31/2015)—The requirements of R.C. 1509.16 became effective March 31, 2015. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:24 am
Instead, under R.C. 4743.10(B), the Court is bound simply to examine whether Defendant holds genuine ethical concerns contrary the proposed course of treatment. [read post]
31 May 2006, 6:06 am
MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONSIn re Ohio Criminal Sentencing Statutes Cases, 2006-Ohio-2626.Dispositions of currently pending appeals based on the decision in State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 5:02 am
Finally, one appeals court had enough (PDF), and denounced them in ringing language:Burdge could not demonstrate that an actual injury was not a required element of his claims because R.C. 1345.18 explicitly sets out an injury requirement. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 12:31 pm
DRA violated R.C. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 10:58 am
Specifically R.C. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 6:11 pm
In re Estate of Holycross This summary was prepared by the Office of Public Information for the general public and news media. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 12:58 pm
”) In re Activision Blizzard, Inc. [read post]
