Search for: "In re Rowles"
Results 101 - 120
of 170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2011, 1:45 pm
His specific problem was with the content of Vander Ark’s work, which he found to be derivative and largely a re-appropriation of Rowling’s novels, as opposed to an honest reference work. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:59 am
Rowling's movie franchise" http://j.mp/qnfGiI The Black Times is out! [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:59 am
Rowling! [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 5:12 am
Rowling's latest trick: the mysterious website Pottermore" http://j.mp/kjObSX "The Mess We're In: Reviewing the New York Times Review of the Documentary About the Times" http://j.mp/kQMalV are you sad to see the end of peter everett? [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:05 am
I am also re-reading the Harry Potter series with my son who has recently become interested in the JK Rowling books. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 9:22 am
Chase would have been able to keep getting away with overcharging military families' mortgages if it hadn't been for Marine Captain Jonathan Rowles, who sued Chase for violating a law that protects active duty military from financial harm while they're deployed. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:59 am
This topic has been inspired by recent litigation on both sides of the Atlantic on the "Harry Potter and the Stolen Story" litigation brought by the estate of Adrian Jacobs ("Willie the Wizard") against JK Rowling and her allies, by the recent re-emergence of format right protection -- which, we hear, has just been accorded copryight status in Brazil -- and by some fresh spats over computer games. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:14 am
Rowling, in her Harry Potter series, presents a flawless portrait of a biglaw partner.Continue reading at The People’s Therapist… [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:27 am
(TTABlog) TTAB precedential no. 50: TTAB says consent and license from registrant require reversal of 2(d) refusal of WACKER NEUSON over NEUSON for Machinery – In re Wacker Neuson SE (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no. 1: TTAB affirms 2(e)(5) functionality refusal of motorcycle stand design: In re Charles N. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:13 am
If you've not yet sent an entry, or indeed have and now know that it hasn't been received, please (re)send. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:56 pm
That's hardly the stuff of Tolkien, Larsson, or Rowling. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:08 pm
Rowls, 2010 U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 5:51 pm
"JK Rowling Doesn't Rule Out Another Harry Potter" http://j.mp/bTiJJj i wonder how long this will last ... [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:59 am
This month, we’re passing the candle to you. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:07 am
Rowling’s “Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone” a little better… well, sort of, anyway. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 4:03 am
(Hetcher says Rowling purports to allow everything but pornography; in this he is mistaken, as Rowling/the WB made some noises about this years back but have stopped, though age-rating of explicit fan content, including HP content, is regularly practiced. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
Baroness Hale and others of course rejected such a notion obiter in Campbell and the High Court in the JK Rowling (Murray v Express Newspapers) case struck out JK Rowling’s claim on behalf of her young son after she was photographed in the street in Edinburgh, pushing him in his pram. [read post]
28 May 2010, 9:50 pm
More generally: you just want to make your thing better/faster/cheaper; you’re still focused on the product. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:58 pm
There are large communities dedicated to, such as Harry Potter fan fiction, even after Rowling successfully sues another fan creation in court.So, while an entire blog could be dedicated to the top of fan creations in copyright, we’re going to take a brief look at the issue and try to understand where we sit on the issue today.What the Law SaysAccording to copyright law, copyright holders have the sole right to distribute derivative works based on an original creation. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 12:21 pm
Last week the USPTO announced interim procedures for re-calculating and extending patent terms. [read post]
