Search for: "In re STATE QUESTION NO. 236" Results 101 - 120 of 243
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2012, 4:15 am by Daniel Richardson
  To succeed, the Club must control the property—all 236 acres. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
In a 236-185 vote, the House of Representatives passed a bill that would ban uranium mining in over 1 million acres of the Grand Canyon. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 10:34 am
We therefore follow our ordinary practice of re­manding so that the Court of Appeals can reconsider, under the proper standard, whether the relevant claims in the ’753 patent are sufficiently definite. [...].Id. at *14 (some internal citations omitted).ConclusionFor the reasons stated, we vacate the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.Nautilus, Inc. at… [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am by INFORRM
  In such circumstances, and against the backdrop of the law generally in this field being in a state of rapid flux at this time, the Court of Appeal in Greene might certainly be forgiven if, with the benefit of hindsight, it appears that it failed to apply Re S correctly. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am by Carolina Attorneys
In North Carolina, a trial court has a statutory duty to hold a hearing to resolve questions of a defendant’s competency if the issue is raised by any party. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
We're talking about the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, to be precise. [read post]