Search for: "In re Scruggs" Results 101 - 120 of 204
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2008, 8:41 pm
We’re not sure if it’s a regional thing or a generational thing, but we had no idea what this meant. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 1:50 am
  That's what we're gonna talk about. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 8:02 am
Translation: let's contract the lawsuit to conserve resources -- massive civil lawsuits consume money like you're throwing shovelfuls of dollars into a furnace; our main man, Scruggs, got whistled for an alleged technical foul and is on the bench; the government is treating us like we forgot to put on deodorant; this thing is just sittin' here like a '73 Plymouth on blocks; and you know what? [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 6:54 am
 I mean, we are all on his back to talk when he fell silent in the wake of the Scruggs indictment, but now it looks like Quiet Jim knew better than Chatty Jim. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 7:44 pm
Hood, a Democrat, was easily re-elected to a second term in November 2007. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:21 pm
We’d link to all the orders, but trust us, they’re not that interesting. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 11:40 am
The legal blogosphere is proceeding full speed ahead this morning, and we're here to take its pulse. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 12:32 am
As I've said before, your perspective depends on which end of the microscope you're on. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 2:55 am
There again, the premise of your question is they're the very same documents. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 4:40 pm
Parloff, among much else, explains why he thinks the defense isn’t using the word “entrapment” though that’s essentially what they’re alleging. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 11:01 pm
  The fact that Scruggs had just contributed $33,000 to his re-election campaign, he said, had absolutely nothing to do with his decision -- didn't even serve as an attention-getter.Another curious aspect of Hood's testimony is he portrayed himself far differently than he has throughout his career, especially when running for re-election last year. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:08 am
" Wilson, Alwyn Luckey and Scruggs each had their own stake in a group Scruggs started to file asbestos cases. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 9:21 pm
"If you're asking me, 'Did somebody come to me and threaten me? [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 6:11 am
"  But even though Scruggs didn't answer, look at that All-Star cast listed up top, they're not all going to take the Fifth -- should be plenty of good questions and answers today. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 11:42 am
Alas, thankfully, we have another big date to look forward to, one we’re calling Manic Mississippi Monday. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 7:37 am
  David also signed Monsanto’s technology agreement, in which farmers agree not to save and re-plant. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 12:44 am
 Your perspective, it all depends on which end of the microscope you're on. [read post]