Search for: "In the Interest of Justin B" Results 101 - 120 of 247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2012, 4:30 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
These are some of the things I've been tweeting about today: "You Will Never Kill Piracy, and Piracy Will Never Kill You" pjblack.me/Amf3Bu Image via Wikipedia "Justin Bieber Vs. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 9:01 am by Jonathan Bailey
In an interesting twist, BEATDEMONS released Regular with a description that called it a “6ix9ine x Cardi B type beat”. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:50 am by Jonathan Bailey
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday.1: Furious Judge Decries “Blizzard” of Copyright Troll LawsuitsFirst off today Timothy B. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Justin Hughes: analogy to patent applications—written description and enablement are quite different. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
He also noted that the plaintiff’s complaint contains no factual allegations questioning the directors’ independence or suggesting that any of them had any personal or financial interest in adopting the bylaw. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Greenberg & Dennis Hughes, Jr., Sports.comm: it takes a village to build a sports facility, 22 MARQUETTE SPORTS LAW REVIEW 91 (2011)Justin P. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau said “for me, it is unthinkable that a free society would legitimize discrimination against anyone based on religion. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:33 am by Eric E. Johnson
Justin Silverman at CMLP has an extremely thoughtful post on the matter. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:11 am
Holding: The cross-examination testimony was not extrinsic evidence and W.R.E. 608(b) did not apply. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:11 am
Holding: The cross-examination testimony was not extrinsic evidence and W.R.E. 608(b) did not apply. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  History is one answer, but not of as much interest to him. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 10:44 am by INFORRM
Quebec, a quantitative and qualitative survey of the jurisprudence, and an analysis of s.2(b)’s building blocks. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 4:48 am
However, he raised several notes of concern: if extension is really to protect the interests of performers, (a) why does it also apply to sound recordings, (b) why is it not an inalienable right of the performer, and (c) why is it for 95 years rather than the life of the performer? [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 1:05 pm by Jennifer Davis
KIE110 .R53 2016  Richland, Justin B. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:35 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Privately negotiated w/o input from public or public interest groups. [read post]