Search for: "In the Matter of Larkin" Results 101 - 120 of 134
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2012, 10:21 am by interns
(As Larkin and I previewed the argument in some detail, I’ll assume reader familiarity with the key issues in play.) [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 12:27 am by Mark Tushnet
" The review "quoted" -- the scare quotes matter here, and watch where the quotation marks come in the "quotation" -- Larkin's famous poem, This Be the Verse. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:09 pm by Walter Olson
[LATimes, Adler] “Overcriminalization: The Legislative Side of the Problem” [Larkin/Heritage, related Meese] When feds spring false-statements trap, it won’t matter whether you committed underlying offense being investigated [Popehat] “‘Clean Up Government Act’ sparks overcriminalization concerns” [PoL] Former Attorney General Mukasey on ObamaCare recusal flap [Adler] American Antitrust Institute proposals might be discounted given… [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 9:06 am by jpfaff
”] The first sentence is quote from Withrow v Larkin, and thus it could be seen as Roberts relying on precedent. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:19 am by jpfaff
First, as a normative matter, what is the number that goes with "substantial"? [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 6:06 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Larkin’s oral argument preview is available here. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 8:24 pm by Benjamin Wittes
They involve matters central to the disposition of the case, and they thus make much of the dispute between Judges Janice Rogers Brown and Karen LeCraft Henderson, on one side, and David Tatel, on the other, more than a little bit difficult to discern. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 1:39 pm by Robert Chesney
  The other was that all that matters is whether the ultimate custodian of a detainee is in a federal court’s territorial jurisdiction. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
”  Thus, the unavoidably unsafe concept is inherently incompatible with the concept of design defect because no matter what their design they are “incapable of being made safe. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 6:37 am by Amanda Rice
Phelps, which held that the First Amendment shields from tort liability those who stage a peaceful protest on a matter of public concern near a military funeral. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:50 pm by Bexis
 (2) Brochures, booklets, mailing pieces, detailing pieces, file cards, bulletins, calendars, price lists, catalogs, house organs, letters, motion picture films, film strips, lantern slides, sound recordings, exhibits, literature, and reprints and similar pieces of printed, audio, or visual matter descriptive of a drug and references published (for example, the “Physicians Desk Reference”) for use by medical practitioners, pharmacists, or nurses, containing drug information… [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 1:25 am
The court rejected defendants' claim that adjudicating the matter would require the court to determine matters of religious doctrine. [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:24 am
I had been contemplating doing a post following up Lord Justice Wall's Philip Larkin quotation with the (obvious) observation that the problem is that parties just can't see what they are doing. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 8:03 am
Kozlov focuses his practice in the areas of complex commercial litigation, federal and state regulatory matters and gaming law. [read post]