Search for: "In the Matter of the Child of: A. B., Mother." Results 101 - 120 of 1,245
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Thus, the father argued, as a matter of law, that the court could not order him to pay child support to the mother, the noncustodial parent. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 4:48 am by Gregory Forman
Code § 63-17-20(B)–which places custody of a child born out of wedlock with the mother pending court order–does not mean that unwed mothers are favored in initial custody determinations. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 5:44 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
After the court entered a consent order on January 31, 2013, Defendant-Mother and the minor child moved to Ohio. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Gregory Forman
In theory Mother could have collaterally attached the removal order through a Rule 60(b)(4) motion, but she did not do that. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 10:56 am
In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, which, after a hearing, granted the father's petition for sole custody of the subject child. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 6:52 am by MBettman
R.C. 3107.07(B)(2)(b) (A putative father’s consent is not required for adoption of a minor child when the father has willfully abandoned or failed to care for and support the minor.) [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 7:29 am by Joel R. Brandes
After the mother agreed to keep her boyfriend away from the child, Family Court granted the mother supervised visitation. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:28 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 Justice Thomas asked what recourse a trial judge had if a destitute mother had a child fifty percent of the time - how could the mother put food on the table for visits? [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:30 am by koherston
Facts: When Mother and Father divorced, Mother was designated the primary residential parent for Child. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:20 pm by Stephen Bilkis
B persistently contacted Brookwood inquiring about A’s welfare, made a couple of visits and was informed that the matter of his paternity could go no further unless A's mother participated in the process. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 4:09 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Here, the natural mother was not directly aggrieved by the alleged defect in section 115-b. [read post]