Search for: "In the Matter of the Petition of H. A. L."
Results 101 - 120
of 366
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2011, 8:39 am
L. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:54 pm
Attorneys for Appellant: Bryan H. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 4:30 am
Her practice is based in the Washington, DC area, where she represents clients in their international business transactions, U.S. government contracting efforts, and immigration matters. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:41 am
Alan H. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 7:35 pm
One auction would be for low skilled immigrants (similar to the H-2 visa) to fill jobs that Americans tend to shun; the other would be for H-1B workers in specialty occupations (and possibly also TN workers from Mexico and Canada under NAFTA and L-1 intracompany transferees). [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 3:21 am
The most recent word on the subject comes from Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Elizabeth H. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 7:45 am
Dehney and Michael H. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 6:28 pm
(a) The superior courts of the several counties shall have exclusive jurisdiction in all matters of adoption, except such jurisdiction as may be granted to the juvenile courts. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:57 am
Medical care expenses sustained in the past; h. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm
L. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 1:31 am
Luis H. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:29 pm
L. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
H., --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2020 WL 1056521, 2020 N.Y. [read post]
15 May 2020, 11:52 am
This trend seems to have benefited by the enactment of Immigration and Nationality Act § 214(c)(10) which allows H-1B employers to dispense with the filing of a new or amended petition following a corporate restructuring if a “new corporate entity succeeds to the interests and obligations of the original petitioning employer . . . [read post]
15 May 2020, 11:52 am
This trend seems to have benefited by the enactment of Immigration and Nationality Act § 214(c)(10) which allows H-1B employers to dispense with the filing of a new or amended petition following a corporate restructuring if a “new corporate entity succeeds to the interests and obligations of the original petitioning employer . . . [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm
Moses H. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 3:48 pm
Regarding Items 1.a, 2.a, 2.c, 2.d, 2.e, 2.f, 2.h, 2.i, 3.a, 3.l, 3.p, 4.a, 4.j, that they are generally unresponsive to the demand and/or attempt to respond by reference to other documents. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:11 pm
(Mark L., 34 Cal.3d 171.) [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
M did not contest the petition, and it was granted on March 28, 2016. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
M did not contest the petition, and it was granted on March 28, 2016. [read post]
