Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. M. S., Child." Results 101 - 120 of 418
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2015, 9:08 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" Significantly, in the nearly two decades this matter has been pending, plaintiffs never moved to amend their complaint (CPLR 3025) to encompass additional acts of alleged negligence subsequent to March 1984, the last incident alleged in the complaint. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 3:48 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The amended petition in these companion matters alleges inter alia respondent's tendency toward sadistic sexual practice as well as bestiality. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am by Joel R. Brandes
It remitted the matter to the Family Court for a new hearing and determination. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:39 am by James R. Marsh
SHIRLEY Do not make this childs welfare about you and your past. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am by familoo
And that’s what this post is about. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:12 am
F engaged in the necessary work, but M declined to. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 1:54 pm by James R. Marsh
And he (or, for that matter, she) works with children as a function of being drawn to them for reasons beyond their welfare. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 9:08 am by familoo
It appears in fact that this is a matter first raised in December 2011, then shelved, then halfheartedly wheeled out for the Annual Father's Day Useless Dad Bashing Fiesta, see here in the Telegraph. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:39 pm
Further, a conviction for endangering the welfare of a child under Penal Law section 260.10(1) conclusively establishes a lack of moral integrity" CONTRACTS, JUDGMENT ENFORCEMENT, LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW, PROPERTY LAW & REAL ESTATE Cox v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 2:10 pm
 If the kid's in danger, it doesn't matter whether the danger is "because" of the parent. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 11:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  If it’s really commitment that matters, it shouldn’t matter what the valence is. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
The record showed that his concern for the childs welfare was paramount. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm by familoo
One or two have expressed concern for the child, wondering how the court’s decision could be compatible with its duty to prioritise the childs welfare as paramount. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 8:59 am by Adam Levitin
So I’m just not seeing where the CFPB is “effectively prohibiting products that harm some consumers some of the time. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 8:28 am by Andrew Delaney
” I’m not sure I agree, but that’s the way SCOV puts it. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 6:56 am by Kate Fort
We want to add a large caveat, which is that none of us are experts on Canadian law or child welfare. [read post]