Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: C. A. M" Results 101 - 120 of 312
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2019, 6:56 am by Kate Fort
We want to add a large caveat, which is that none of us are experts on Canadian law or child welfare. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 5:51 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLC
There was no evidence before the ZBA to show that granting the application would adversely affect environmental conditions (see Matter of L & M Grazoise, LLP v City of Glen Cove Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 127 AD3d 863, 865). [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A: I’m not saying that we’re smarter than them. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:57 am by Simon Lester
I'm not sure ISDS supporters would even disagree with that. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 5:46 am by Kevin
That’s not his only bill on this important matter, though. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 5:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
" On the one hand, public officials are free to promote their views about public welfare, including by using their bully pulpits to "cajole[] and exhort" others to repudiate positions or groups the officials view as pernicious. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 2:53 pm by Bianca Saad
In response to the significant implications of the ABC Test, CalChamber has led the I’m Independent Coalition, a coalition of affected workers and businesses. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
Although public officials are free to express their opinions and may condemn viewpoints or groups they view as inimical to public welfare, they cannot abuse their regulatory authority to retaliate against disfavored advocacy organizations and to impose burdens on those organizations' ability to conduct lawful business. [read post]
24 May 2018, 7:20 pm by Adam Levitin
  To the extent that a loan from lender A is not really a substitute for a loan from lenders B or C, then the presence of additional competitors in the market may not matter for consumer welfare. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am by Florian Mueller
Commissioner Terrell McSweeny, Holding the Line on Patent Holdup: Why Antitrust Enforcement Matters, Mar. 21, 2018. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 2:45 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Ramsey: chilling effect of demand letters, but that’s all about notice.Dinwoodie: you’re making normative choices about security/predictability.Bone: I’m just not separating into 2 boxes.Sheff: non-consumer welfare/efficiency based perspectives: Blinded Veterans presents a bit of a problem b/c we have a conflict b/t access to generic concepts and consumer confusion. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:42 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Gives WHD enforcement authority in FLSA sections 16(b) and 16(c) to, among other things, recover all tips unlawfully kept by the employer, in addition to an equal amount in liquidated damages. [read post]