Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: C. M. S., Child"
Results 101 - 112
of 112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2010, 12:28 pm
I/M/O W.R. and L.R. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
In A's case there was some documentary evidence too, while in the other an immigration judge had accepted that M was 17 years old. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
In A's case there was some documentary evidence too, while in the other an immigration judge had accepted that M was 17 years old. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 9:44 am
[C]harges that could include criminal nuisance, endangering the welfare of a minor and obstructing government administration, Smith said. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:40 am
Eugene M. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 11:54 am
Samih M. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
The House of Lords disagrees, and adds some ‘helpful’ observations… Lord Hoffmann considers that when a residence order is made, the Court’s decision is based upon the welfare of the child in circumstances as they are or may reasonably be expected to be. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 10:42 pm
The JR application was effectively on the basis that a child who fell under s.20(1)(c), a G did, was owed the s.20 accommodation duty. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 1:27 pm
C. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 2:10 pm
C: That's true. [read post]
9 May 2007, 8:06 am
As before, custody matters are not to be decided by a jury. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 7:01 am
RSR Citation: 2007 WY 4 Docket Number: C-06-5 Appeal from the District Court of Albany County, the Honorable Robert Castor, Judge Representing Appellant (Respondent): John M. [read post]
