Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: T. B., Child"
Results 101 - 120
of 277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2016, 2:09 pm
So as a matter of judging individual welfare in ability-to-pay terms, if I give a $1M gift to my kids, this is $1M worth of consumption by me andby them. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:52 am
” The Court of Appeals noted “[t]hese findings, viewed as a whole, do not amount to ‘a substantial change in circumstances affecting the welfare of the child’ or a showing that the ‘change in custody is in the overall best interests of the child. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
Last week, a class action lawsuit entitled Gary B. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:28 pm
” In the Matter of the Adoption of Baby T., 311 N.J. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:40 pm
McFarlane J echoed what he had said in Re W about the importance of parents taking responsibility for their children’s relationship with both parents: at para 59 Re D (A Child) [2014] EWCA Civ 1057, It is they [the parents] who, on those findings, hold the key that might unlock matters for B. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:37 pm
Argues that defining difference b/t creative works and inventions is the way in which they are individuated. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:20 pm
In the case of s97, the court may relax the prohibition where the welfare of the child ‘requires it’. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In Michael B. v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 7:06 am
This way our emotions don’t get the better of us. [read post]
2 May 2020, 7:06 am
This way our emotions don’t get the better of us. [read post]
15 May 2020, 6:20 am
When evaluating where the balance lies between these two competing rights and interests it is important, to my mind, that judges of the Family Court do not allow ourselves to remain magnetically attracted to the welfare principle (i.e. that the welfare of the child is the paramount consideration). [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 8:21 am
If you want more time with your children no matter what the Guardian Ad Litem says don’t get mad…get even. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 8:31 am
”Virginia Code § 20-124.2(B). [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:42 am
” On appeal, Patterson argued, as to her defamation claim, that Grant-Herms’ “statements were `both undisputed and patently false,’ and `an attempt by [Grant–Herms] to paint [Patterson] as someone that would endanger the welfare of a four-year-old child. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 8:21 am
HSLF invites Texans to review the scorecard and see where their representatives stand on animal welfare. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:23 pm
That case follows hot on the heels of Re B (A Child) [2013] UKSC 33. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 7:21 pm
This is a matter of basic rationality, after all. 1. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
Let’s work that back: If there is there is some evidence that suggests that any form of involvement would put the child at risk of harm then the parent is not a qualifying parent and the presumption doesn’t apply. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
The Absurdity of the "We Don't Want to Affirmatively Facilitate Abortions" Argument.That same evening, DOJ sought a stay of the injunction as to Roe (but not as to Poe) in both the court of appeals and the U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 8:31 am
I haven’t encountered that but it seems eminently possible. [read post]
