Search for: "International Art Co. v. Federal Trade Commission"
Results 101 - 120
of 175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist) Australia I thought cats were colour blind… Federal Court confirms Mars has exclusive right to use colour ‘Whiskas purple’ for cat food: Mars Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Effem Foods Pty Ltd) v Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCAFC: On appeal, simulated flames from direct light found infringing: Bitech… [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
Pull'R Holding Co., LLC (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) US Patents USPTO expands application exchange program (Patent Docs) Reducing patent pendency: The PTO responds (Inventive Step) USPTO expands Green Technology Pilot Program; eliminates the program’s technology classification requirement (IP Spotlight) Green patent PR: Marketing clean tech on the fast track (Green Patent Blog) Transition: Chief Judge Michel --> Chief Judge Rader (Patently-O) Patent Litigation Weekly:… [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:24 pm
In the decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part and reversed-in-part the International Trade Commission’s (“the Commission”) final determination in Certain Digital Televisions and Certain Products Containing Same and Methods of Using Same (Inv. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:54 am
In Ariad v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 1:14 am
The opinion in SEC v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Coleman Co., Inc. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Coleman Co., Inc. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
Moreover, they often capitulate to requests to classify information as trade secret, confidential and therefore unavailable to the public. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:28 pm
Ajinomoto Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 6:15 am
International Trade Comm’n, __ F.3d __ (Fed. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
Powerscreen International Distribution Limited et al. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
Click Here U.S. action on climate policy is key to international treaty. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 1:18 pm
On December 10, 2009, the Federal Circuit is scheduled to hear oral argument in Vizio, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 12:29 am
The ruling in Tafas v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
How much money a ‘patent troll’ makes (The Prior Art) Hospital TTO takes a different path to commercialisation with private sale of IP (Technology Transfer Tactics) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Attendance at single trade show to display infringing product sufficient for personal jurisdiction: Synthes (U.S.A.) v G.M. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
How much money a 'patent troll' makes (The Prior Art) Hospital TTO takes a different path to commercialisation with private sale of IP (Technology Transfer Tactics) US Patents - Decisions CAFC: Attendance at single trade show to display infringing product sufficient for personal jurisdiction: Synthes (U.S.A.) v G.M. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
How much money a 'patent troll' makes (The Prior Art) Hospital TTO takes a different path to commercialisation with private sale of IP (Technology Transfer Tactics) US Patents - Decisions CAFC: Attendance at single trade show to display infringing product sufficient for personal jurisdiction: Synthes (U.S.A.) v G.M. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(Spicy IP) ‘Tirupati laddus’ granted registration as a geographical indication (Spicy IP) Malaysia Malaysian Federal Court: McDonald’s final defeat by McCurry in trade mark battle (IPKat) Netherlands District Court of The Hague: Procter & Gamble companies win trade mark infringement summary proceedings brought by Debonairre against their Naomi Campbell product line (Class 46) South Africa Copycat… [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
(IP Watchdog) Making a Federal Circuit case of that? [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]
