Search for: "JACKSON v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al"
Results 101 - 120
of 133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:44 am
Gibsons Restaurant Group et. al. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 2:17 pm
See, e.g., Medellin v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:51 am
Ginsburg et al., Fair Labor Standards Handbook, App. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am
[et al.], editors.New York : Springer, c2008. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am
Thomas Dale Delay et al. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm
Massey Coal Company, Inc., et al. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here National Union Fire Insurance Company et al. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
WW, LLC, et al. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
(IP Osgoode) United States US General IP outsourcing threatens national interest? [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:16 am
DESTEFANO, ET AL. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 8:16 am
Supreme Court which decided the historic case about global warming (Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
United States District Court for the District of Arizona, et al. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
United States DOL, et al. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
United States DOL, et al. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States Issue: Whether, under federal common law, a government contract is void from the outset if its formation was induced by a misrepresentation. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
