Search for: "JOHN DOE I-X" Results 101 - 120 of 872
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2022, 9:48 am by Florian Mueller
It is true that a device maker A with a supplier X could be at a competitive disadvantage if its competitor B benefited from a lower royalty rate because of a deal between a given patent holder and its supplier Y.It is a legitimate objective in its own right to oppose price erosion, but with the ND-part-of-FRAND argument, one simply stands on higher ground and takes a position that is in the public interest.Qualcomm's John Han very much emphasized use-based pricing. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Instead, I want to return to Tribe’s essay and its relevance to Fleming’s own project. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm by admin
In “Cheng’s Proposed Consensus Rule for Expert Witnesses,”[1] I discussed a recent law review article by Professor Edward K. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  I had not previously met Jeanne Sheehan Zaino or Wilfred Codrington (though I did happily blurb the book on constitutional amendment that Wilfred co-authored with John Kowal). [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 3:04 pm by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
Marlene Gebauer and Greg Lambert, along with John DiGilio will wrap up the conference through a discussion of Axelle Flemming’s and the other presentations of the day. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:31 am by Geoffrey S. Corn, Peter Margulies
However, I heard little or nothing about constraints imposed by LOAC principles. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:56 am by Samuel Bray
Including "don't use x until we can figure out who x belongs to," which is not far from this case (though the fact that the seized material has already been reviewed might be a relevant distinction). [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
This new article of mine will be coming out next year in the Journal of Law and Religion, and I thought I'd serialize it here; there's still plenty of time for editing, so I'd love to hear people's feedback. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 7:27 am by Harbir Deol
Title III § 302(a)(v)(II)(cc) (2018)[xiii] America COMPETES Act, Title X § 1003(b)[xiv] America COMPETES Act, Title X § 1005[xv] America COMPETES Act, Title X § 1003(1)(B)(i)[xvi] 31 CFR § 800.901(b)[xvii] America COMPETES Act, Title X § 1004[xviii] Coalition Letter on the National Critical Capabilities and Defense Act by U.S. [read post]