Search for: "JOHNSON V AIR FORCE" Results 101 - 120 of 186
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
On 10 March 2020  Nicol J heard an application in the case of Johnson v McArdle. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 5:00 am by Dan Maurer
Moreover, in 2013, the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces addressed how the civilian secretary of the Air Force could have committed actual or apparent UCI, even though that civilian, like the president, is not subject to the military jurisdiction Article 2 of the UCMJ. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Besides the Air Force (circa 300,000 people), Verio is the largest company that I’ve ever worked for. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 1:06 am
” In 2003, Todd Construction received two task orders from the United States Army Corps of engineers (“Corps”) for roof repair of buildings at the Seymour Johnson Air Force Base in North Carolina, and the work was completed in September of 2005. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
On 19 July 2022 Johnson J heard an application in the case of Hills v Fomukong Epse Tabe. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
– Gene Johnson, The Seattle Times, January 26, 2010 Washington state will do more to prevent polluted stormwater from running off state highways into rivers, lakes and Puget Sound. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm by Peter L. Strauss
Do we really need to be concerned that newspapers and the public misunderstand United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:17 am
Weinberger, 475 U.S. 503 (1986) (Jewish Air Force psychologist who objected to a no-headgear rule); Jenkins v. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 7:54 am by John Floyd
    Commissioner Murphy and Director Kennedy jointed forces in their surveillance of Malcolm after the Johnson Hinton incident. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:20 am by Neil Kinkopf
Johnson), and a host of federalism decisions (Pennsylvania v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 12:21 pm by Zack Bluestone
According to Ashley Townshend of the Asia Sentinel, most observers expect the Permanent Court of Arbitration to find that it has jurisdiction to hear the Republic of Philippines v. [read post]