Search for: "JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE" Results 101 - 120 of 121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2010, 6:48 pm by Richard Montes
” The Third Department looked to Saxton v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:01 pm by Keith Rizzardi
9 is ambiguous, that we must apply the deference principles set forth in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:47 am by Erin Miller
(all) Amicus brief of the Cato Institute et al. (09-988) Amicus brief of eight states (09-991) Title: PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am by Lawrence Solum
Justice Douglas then read his opinions for the Court in Capital Services, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
11 - Marc Randazza took time out from INTA to post about an interesting decision, holding that a domain privacy service can be contributorily liable for the actions of its customers, at least on these facts… 12 - Venkat Balasubramani also took time out from INTA to post about the fleeting nature of Facebook friendships, and how one court has taken judicial notice of that 13 - Moshe Glickman, author of the Circumlocutions blog, shows us one of the best uses for a towel. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
11 - Marc Randazza took time out from INTA to post about an interesting decision, holding that a domain privacy service can be contributorily liable for the actions of its customers, at least on these facts… 12 - Venkat Balasubramani also took time out from INTA to post about the fleeting nature of Facebook friendships, and how one court has taken judicial notice of that 13 - Moshe Glickman, author of the Circumlocutions blog, shows us one of the best uses for a towel. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am by Abbott & Kindermann
  The Department of Water Resources was preparing for the Monterey Agreement. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:00 am
Culliver (09-158) - originally Conference 11.6 [involves lawyers from Akin Gump and Howe & Russell] United States Defense Department v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:11 am
Van Hook (09-144) United States Defense Department v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IAM) Lost knowledge (IP Spotlight) Nobel Prize winning physicist R B Laughlin explains how IP damages innovation (Techdirt) US v China IP case before the World Trade Organisation - differing news on who won or lost (EXCESS COPYRIGHT) (Chinese Law Prof Blog) WIPO Assemblies conclude (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch)       Global – Trade Marks / Brands   Trade mark marking strategy - R and TM… [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
” In 1973 the Strines moved to Hockessin, outside of Wilmington, when Leo’s father got a job as a buyer at Lit Brothers, a Philadelphia department store. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
: (IAM), Voting procedures set for WIPO DG vote next week: (Intellectual Property Watch), People: Change of IP guard at US, Australia missions; IFPMA readies new leader: (Intellectual Property Watch), What is intellectual property fraud? [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:24 am
Kaplan on Monday prevented attorneys Robert Fink and Caroline Rule from withdrawing as defense counsel to former KPMG partner Richard Smith in United States v. [read post]