Search for: "Jack Goldsmith, Bob Bauer"
Results 101 - 120
of 137
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2018, 10:11 am
Jack Goldsmith argued that the special counsel’s indictment of Russian hackers could unwittingly aid U.S. adversaries. [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 5:26 am
Jack Goldsmith discussed the implications of the White House counsel’s cover letter to the release of the Nunes memo. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 6:43 am
Wittes posted a special edition of the Lawfare Podcast in which he discussed the Times story with Bob Bauer, Carrie Cordero, Jack Goldsmith and Steve Vladeck: Bob Bauer argued that White House Counsel Donald McGahn protected the institution of the White House counsel when he threatened to resign rather than execute President Trump’s order to fire Mueller. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 8:56 am
Wittes posted a special edition of the Lawfare Podcast on the Times story with Jack Goldsmith, Steve Vladeck, Carrie Cordero, and Bob Bauer. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 8:19 pm
Joining me on the recorded conference call (pardon the audio quality) were Lawfare contributors Jack Goldsmith, Steve Vladeck, Carrie Cordero, and Bob Bauer. [read post]
6 Jan 2018, 6:15 am
Wittes also posted a special edition of the Lawfare Podcast, featuring New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt—along with Susan Hennessey, Jack Goldsmith, and Bob Bauer for a discussion of Schmidt’s article on White House Counsel Donald McGahn’s attempt to stop Attorney General Jeff Sessions from recusing himself from the Russia investigation. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:29 am
Wittes also posted the Lawfare Podcast, featuring New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt along with Susan Hennessey, Jack Goldsmith, and Bob Bauer for a discussion of Schmidt’s article on White House Counsel Donald McGahn’s attempt to prevent Attorney General Jeff Sessions from recusing himself from the Russian investigation. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:26 pm
We put together a special edition podcast with Schmidt, along with me, Susan Hennessey, Jack Goldsmith, and Bob Bauer to discuss what the story might mean for the future of the investigation. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 8:58 am
Bob Bauer considered how Trump’s encroachment on the Justice Department may erode the norm of the independence of federal law enforcement. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Jack Goldsmith: The Constitutionality of the Syria Strike Through the Eyes of OLC (and the Obama Administration) Andrew Kent: An Addendum on the Constitutionality of War Powers Julian Ku: China’s Surprising Refusal to Criticize the Legality of the U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2017, 5:15 pm
Jack Goldsmith found the decision bizarre and somewhat embarrassing. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 3:59 am
Jack Goldsmith defended FBI Director Christopher Wray and Rod Rosenstein’s responses to attacks on their workforces from Trump. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 4:53 am
Jack Goldsmith and Robert Williams argued that the recent indictment of three Chinese hackers shows the 2015 U.S. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 6:32 am
Bob Bauer argued that the impeachment process should be viewed more as a safeguard on the modern presidency than as a constitutional crisis. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 10:38 am
Jack Goldsmith analyzed the process of creating a legal justification supporting military strikes against North Korea. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 5:33 am
Jack Goldsmith highlighted Richard Danzig’s upcoming Lawfare Working Paper on “The Technology Tsunami and the Liberal World Order. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 4:10 am
Bob Bauer described what President Trump’s proposed pardon of Joe Arpaio would signal about his presidency. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 4:26 am
Bob Bauer argued against recent suggestions to limit the President’s ability to fire the special counsel and criticized Congress’s “impeachment anxiety syndrome. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 6:27 am
Bob Bauer examined President Trump’s public beratement of Attorney General Jeff Sessions and his apparent misunderstanding of his relationship with the Justice Department. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:23 pm
Bob Bauer discussed recent developments in the relationship between Trump and the Justice Department. [read post]
