Search for: "James Walker v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
He did not work for NME and was never discarded by the IPC as a possible editor for the magazine.” Jeremy Clarke-Williams, Russell Jones Walker, acted for the claimant. [read post]
Lord Roger, with whom Lord Walker and Lord Collins agreed, was also content to ground his understanding of persecution in a right that does expressly exist within international human rights law. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am by Marie Louise
Newsru LTD (The IP Factor)   Netherlands Major Usenet provider ordered to remove all infringing content (TorrentFreak)   United Kingdom Expedited trials in English patent actions – HTC v Apple (judgment of Arnold J on 19th September 2011) (Kluwer Patent Blog) Newzbin2 team up with The Pirate Bay to defeat site blocking (TorrentFreak) EWHC (Pat): Halliburton gets simulation patent after all: Halliburton Energy Services v Comptroller-General of Patents… [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:27 am by Mary L. Dudziak
:Insurrections & Infections: Rethinking the Legal History of Atlanta, 1920-1940 – InmanChair - Robert Baker, Georgia State UniversityPolly Price, Emory University, “Federalization of the Mosquito: Malaria and Public Health In the Southern United States, 1900-1945”Maryan Soliman, University of Pennsylvania, “Racial Equality on Trial in Atlanta during the 1930s”Anders Walker, Saint Louis University, “Scarlett’s Rainbow:… [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm by Robert A Levy - Guest
United States for a unanimous Court put it this way:  “The limitations that federalism entails are not therefore a matter of rights belonging only to the States. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kevin
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco:  Michael M ____ v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am by Amanda Rice
United States and United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Law Lady
 Billing Fraud: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T DISMISS MEDICARE FRAUD DEFENDANTS, United States v. [read post]