Search for: "James v. Social Security Administration"
Results 101 - 120
of 333
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm
Old Norms and New Challenges in Spain’s Response to COVID-19 May 20, 2020 | Susana de la Sierra, University of Castilla-La Mancha The complex legal, social, and political realities of Spain’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic may share many aspects in common with regulatory responses in other jurisdictions. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Tallent v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:09 pm
Surveillance The Local had a piece “Drones and surveillance cameras: France’s new security bill explained”. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:11 am
Smith, Brian V. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
In doing so, I mean in no way whatsoever to diminish the damage Trump has done to social and moral institutions. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 10:43 am
Public funding In Espinoza v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Remember that day’s Espinoza v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:32 am
The Crown Court Decision Ms Hilton pled guilty in 2015 under section 105A of the Social Security Administration (Northern Ireland) Act 1972 to obtaining income support dishonestly by failing to report that she had part-time employment. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm
France On 19 June 2020 France’s top court for administrative law dismissed Google’s appeal against a $57M fine issued by the data watchdog for not making it clear enough to Android users how it processes their personal information. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am
For the record, in Ordered Liberty (2013), a book I co-authored with James E. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
31 May 2020, 4:22 pm
Twitter Inc, Reddit and a group representing major internet firms have filed an amicus brief in support of a lawsuit challenging a Trump Administration’s 2019 rules requiring nearly all U.S. visitors and visa applicants to disclose social media user information from the prior five years. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:51 am
The subcommittee staff’s analysis of the constitutionality of remote voting and participation focused heavily on whether a proposed change to the Senate’s rules, or the adoption of a new rule, would comply with the three-part test the Supreme Court established in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 12:36 pm
" Failure to comply with the order may result in administrative or criminal penalties …. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 5:53 am
James Madison Proj. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 10:58 am
See Stewart v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
This would certainly be a case where the president’s actions exposed him or her as a threat to national security. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am
.: The House Foreign Affairs Committee will hold a hearing onthe administration's Iran policy. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
FTC v. [read post]
