Search for: "Jammie Thomas-Rasset" Results 101 - 120 of 247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2009, 4:40 am
In a retrial, Jammie Thomas-Rasset was found to have willfully violated copyright law in sharing songs on the file-sharing program KaZaA [website], which [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 2:17 pm by Doug Isenberg
The top four record labels have won a significant decision in their long-running suit against Jammie Thomas-Rasset, the Minnesota woman found by a court to have “lied” about illegally uploading music to the Web. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:14 am by Ray Beckerman
Thomas-Rasset, oral argument before the US Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit is scheduled for Tuesday, June 12th, at 9:00 A.M. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 9:40 am by Jonathan Bailey
Thomas-Rasset, was sued in April 2006 after she refused to settle to allegations she had illegally shared music files online. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:53 am
See AP: Jury rules against Minn. woman in download caseOf the $1.92 million verdict against Jammie Thomas-Rasset for sharing 24 songs, note that federal copyright law allows $750 to $30,000 per infringement AND also allows the jury to raise that to as much as $150,000 per track if it finds the infringements were willful. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 8:52 am by Derek Bambauer
Round Three of the Jammie Thomas-Rasset trial is over. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 2:01 am
In this article in p2pnet, the Thomas-Rasset family's struggle to focus on "day to day life", with yet another RIAA trial looming on the horizon, is explored. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 10:51 am by Ray Beckerman
Thomas-Rasset, Judge Davis has denied defendant's motion for reconsideration, which asked the judge to determine the issue of the constitutionality of the award under on due process grounds. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:15 pm
That amounts to $80,000 for each of the songs Jammie Thomas-Rasset was accused of downloading. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 12:12 pm by TWiT
Hosts: Denise Howell and Evan BrownCalifornia wants to shorten privacy policy wording, Jammie Thomas-Rasset's supreme court case, YouTube keeping copyrighted material out, and more.Guest: Father Robert BallecerDownload or subscribe to this show at twit.tv/twil.Talking points on DeliciousWe invite you to read, add to, and amend our show notes.TWiL on FriendfeedTWiL on FacebookAttorneys may submit a self-study form to their local CLE board seeking MCLE credit approval. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 9:00 pm by Ben Snitkoff
Jammie Thomas-Rasset: Take-3 Yesterday, the third installment in the Jammie Thomas-Rasset case began... [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:51 am by Ray Beckerman
Thomas-Rasset, which concluded yesterday, after the Judge refused to instruct the jurors that the amount of the award was required to bear a reasonable relationship to the actual damages sustained by plaintiffs, the jury returned a verdict of $62,500 per song, for a total of $1.5 million.The Judge has previously ruled that the maximum allowable amount in the case is $54,000.Court minutesVerdict[Ed. note. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 9:47 pm
A federal jury ruled Thursday that Jammie Thomas-Rasset willfully violated the copyrights on 24 songs, and awarded recording companies $1.92 million, or $80,000 per song. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 1:21 am
In June, a Minnesota jury awarded the four majors $1.9 million in damages, finding that single mom Jammie Thomas-Rasset had used the peer-to-peer file-sharing network Kazaa to illegally download and share 24 songs. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:33 pm by David Kravets
Thomas-Rasset testifying during her first 2007 trial. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 1:47 am
The record label plaintiffs in the Jammie Thomas-Rasset case have filed a notice of supplementary authority, identifying for the court a new case rejecting the defendant's argument that the Supreme Court's cases imposing constitutional limits on punitive damage awards apply to statutory damages.Verizon v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 2:00 pm
When the Department of Justice last week filed its brief in defense of the constitutionality of the $1.92 million Jammie Thomas-Rasset verdict, it included the following paean to copyright, and statutory damages:Copyrights are of great value, not just to their owners, but to the American public as well. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 4:50 pm
Jammie Thomas, a young mom who has become the Joan of Arc of file sharing, was found guilty of violating 24 song copyrights, and fined 1.92 million dollars, yep, about 80k per tune. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 10:39 am
Jammie Thomas-Rasset has fought the RIAA through four years, two trials, a name change, and a $1.92 million judgment; on November 2, she gets to do it again. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:40 pm
Case in point: the Jammie Thomas-Rasset peer-to-peer trial in Minnesota, the first of the file-sharing cases to make it all the way to a verdict. [read post]