Search for: "Jane Doe 1 and 2"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,006
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Indeed, even if a law school does want to say that one side is correct—again, something I'd recommend against, for reasons given in the University of Chicago's Kalven Report[1]—it can do so, while still stressing that it's important for people to hear both sides: Come hear John Peters and Jane Williams debate immigration policy! [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 9:08 am
Previously, the court had ruled they could claim damages for international sales, though the Ninth Circuit has ruled that is not proper. 2: Ruling Opens the Door to Protecting Room Design Under the Copyright Act Next up today, Jane Wang and Li-Ying Lin at IAM write that, in Taiwan, a new court ruling could open the door to copyright protection for the interior designs of rooms. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
But that dancer (“Jane Doe”) was not a minor. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:44 am
In re Jane Doe, No. 22-70098 (Graber w/Friedland & Koh). [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:02 am
" The identified general exceptions are: (1) where "a would-be Doe who reasonably fears that coming out of the shadows will cause him unusually severe harm (either physical or psychological)"; (2) where "identifying the would-be Doe would harm 'innocent non-parties'"; (3) where "anonymity is necessary to forestall a chilling effect on future litigants who may be similarly situated"; and (4) where the suit is "bound… [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
The published Grade 1 curriculum does not mention or discuss teaching about gender dysphoria and transgender transitioning. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 8:35 am
” What does this mean in reality? [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 7:28 am
Fed. of Gov't Emp., No. 1:20-cv-01558, at 6 n.2 (D.D.C. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 8:51 am
#lawyerbehindthesecene #annulmentcomingsoon #quickmarriage ♬ Seven – Natalie Jane 2. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 10:54 am
[1.] [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
Several months ago, I wrote about a frequent litigant, in connection with a federal case of hers in in which (1) she was first allowed to proceed pseudonymously but then (2) was depseudonymized by the judge after evidence related to her past cases had emerged. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 4:13 am
“We expect that Russia will do what Russia always does — they will veto it,” U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 10:35 am
To help you better understand how to complete Form 1040, we’ll use the example of John Doe and Jane Doe. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:37 am
See id. at Apps. 2a & 2b. [3] See, e.g., Declaration of Jane Doe, Doe v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:24 am
Does 1-20, No. 16CV2218 H (BGS), 2017 WL 1520085, *3 (S.D. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 5:17 am
See, e.g., Doe v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
[1] See Volokh, supra note 1, at 1366–68. [2] See, e.g., DePuy Synthes Prod., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 9:08 am
… [T]he TCPA's purpose is … twofold: to (1) protect a person's First Amendment rights, and also to (2) "protect the rights of a person to file meritorious lawsuits for demonstrable injury. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Protecting People from Their Own Religious Communities: Jane Doe in Church and State
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
[1] Eugene Volokh, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, 73 Hastings Law Journal 1353 (2022) [2] Raiser v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 2:00 am
” John correctly notes that “the primary foil for New Democracy” is a “wrongheaded triumvirate of ideas” that continues to obfuscate our understanding of the emergence of a modern American regulatory state in the 20th century: 1) the myth of a “weak” American state, 2) the myth of laissez-faire constitutionalism, and 3) the myth of Lochner and the New Deal State. [read post]
