Search for: "Jeremy Powers" Results 101 - 120 of 1,606
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2011, 9:37 am by Lawrence Solum
Jeremy Waldron (New York University (NYU) - School of Law) has posted Can Targeted Killing Work as a Neutral Principle? [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:18 am by Howard Bashman
In today’s edition of The Philadelphia Inquirer, Jeremy Roebuck and David Gambacorta have a front page article headlined “Feds say Johnny Doc used Local 98’s money to buy influence, power, and a Philly councilman. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:19 am
Senior Kat Jeremy has made abundantly clear what he thinks of the phrase "what's in a name" ("the most hackneyed phrase in the trade mark and branding lawyer's stock of handy cliches"). [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 6:20 am by Steve Lubet
Within the party itself, compelling evidence exists of extensive spoken and online abuse of Jewish party members; exclusion of Jewish members from participating in party activity; signalling by the party leader that anti-Semitic views are acceptable; the failure to implement processes to protect Jewish members from anti-Semitism; hostile responses to those calling out anti-Semitism; and appointment of anti-Semites to positions of power (indeed, as the Panorama investigation exposed,… [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 3:30 am by Gilberto Morbach
Jeremy Waldron, Rule by Law: A Much Maligned Preposition, available at SSRN. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 8:20 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
Civil liberties groups, however, believe that the free exercise of religion does not mean that religious groups have an absolute right to trump the federal government’s power to enforce civil rights laws. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:18 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
by Jeremy Leaming Plenty of legal scholars and others have been unmoved by the primary argument leveled against the Affordable Care Act, the broccoli argument, and justifiably so. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 4:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
Both text and early practice confirm that the federal power to regulate “commerce with the Indian tribes” was a different, more constrained power than the power to regulate “commerce among the states. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:32 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
by Jeremy Leaming Someday soon, perhaps not soon enough, the fear mongering over the landmark health care reform law, the Affordable Care Act, will be relegated to the dustbins of history. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 4:05 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
They also worry about strong government – one that could use its power to adjust the balance, take some of their wealth, and invest it for the common good. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:03 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
Primarily the reasoning was based on high court precedent in favor of a broad reading of Congress’ power to regulate commerce and to tax and spend for the general welfare. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 6:28 am
Said Jeremy Strong, quoted in "Jeremy Strong Isn’t Sure He Knows Who He Is" (NYT).I put that quote in the post title because it had "festoon" and I'd just written "festoon" yesterday. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:50 pm
Nominations should be sent by November 13, 2015 to Jeremy Mullem at mullem@law.duke.edu. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:20 pm
" Jeremy Pelofsky and James Vicini of Reuters report that "Obama seeks to defuse healthcare row with court. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 2:38 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
by Jeremy Leaming The slew of states challenging the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act’s expansion of Medicaid to cover more of the nation’s poorest, has failed to articulate why the U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:05 am by Amy Howe
  Coverage comes from Lyle Denniston for this blog, Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News, Jeremy P. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 5:36 am by charonqc
Paul Waugh reports “The BBC have just been told that David Cameron will NOT be going head-to-head with Jeremy Paxman on Monday. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 4:15 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: Sceptics of judicial review – from Jeremy Waldron to those in the Judicial Power Project – have tended to attribute to their opponents an erroneous prioritisation of “justice” over “legitimacy. [read post]