Search for: "Jeremy Strong v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2012, 4:09 pm
(In Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:54 am
bit.ly/zwruTK (Ron Friedmann) Cost of Converting (Electronically Stored Information) Jardin v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
” Viacom v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
“There already is a rather strong regulation against hacking people’s telephones – the law. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 5:39 am
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:25 am
In 1947, the Supreme Court, in Lillie v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:28 pm
Moreover, because direct purchasers have frequent interactions with the defendants, they have a strong incentive to discover and litigate the offense. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:15 pm
”[v] Moreover, and “absent acceptable resolution, disputes would fester … [and] likely threaten the very survival of the community. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm
.); and (v) Art & Science – the many ways of epistemic insights.He has been awarded grants by German states for development of new ways in teaching functional illiterates mathematics, together with Marie-Cecile Bertau for her Gilgamesh project, as well as for his Theory of Trust project. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:28 pm
Neoliberalism v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:39 am
Remarkably, the list stated that NGN had not searched for documents contained on or created by NGN’s computer equipment. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am
Times v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
Lemley: think about mental state and the negligence analogy. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 5:02 pm
Jeremy Olson reports that today's testimony revealed Al has an additional health care directive saying that he did not want a feeding tube or other extraordinary measures if he were in a terminal condition. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:07 am
Of most excitement to the IPKat is a piece by a four-strong team from Allen & Overy on the absurd, unjust and (he hopes) soon to be eradicated principle which the Court of Appeal for England and Wales upheld by a 2-1 majority in Coflexip v Stolt that a patent owner can collect infringement damages even when the patent is subsequently ruled to be invalid. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
This function is famously associated with Jeremy Bentham. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:02 pm
Carhart, effectively reversing a prior decision (Stenberg v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:24 am
US-based IP weblog Madisonian.net ("Law, technology, society") is driven by a 13-strong multi-university team under the captaincy of Professor Michael J. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:19 am
Shoemaker, University of Wisconsin-Madison, “Sanctuary Law and a Strong Anglo-Saxon State? [read post]
