Search for: "Joe Wallin"
Results 101 - 119
of 119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2012, 6:00 am
The SEC, Accredited Crowdfunding, And The Art Of Hair Splitting by Joe Wallin If this argument is going to inform the SEC’s rulemaking on this subject, and if the SEC believes that this is what the legislative history indicates should inform the rulemaking, then it is unlikely we are going to see a continuation or retention of a check-the-box or questionnaire regime for advertised offerings. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 5:58 am
“Demo Days” and General Solicitation by Joe Wallin in Startup Law Blog I’ve been writing an article on general solicitation, a long one, and doing a lot of research. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 7:31 am
Also for reference, below, is the text of the letter Joe Wallin and I sent to the SEC with our comments and concerns on rulemaking around the accredited investor definition. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:12 am
A few weeks ago in TechFlash, Dan Rosen, Joe Wallin and I wrote about a prior draft of Senator Bond's amendment, and as we said at the time, the language represents a compromise. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 3:30 am
As Joe Wallin has blogged, this problem could be solved by reversing the presumption: as long as you pay fair value for your founders' shares, presume you've made an 83(b) election to take the tax impact now, rather than over x years, unless you make an affirmative filing to the contrary. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:27 am
And Joe Wallin in his "Startup Company Blog" poses another question that has arisen with the new accredited investor definition (his second query is addressed in the new CDI)... 80% of Pay Unmerited: Feinberg's Final Bankers Compensation Report Everybody is kung fu fighting. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
As Joe Wallin put it on his blog, "The concept of waiting 120 days for the SEC to clear an all accredited investor offering is truly an amazing thing to ponder. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:35 am
Joe Wallin, Dan Rosen and I, together and separately, have written extensively on the changes to Reg D that have been proposed in the course of the drafting and debating of the Wall Street Reform bill. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 5:00 am
Windsor (.pdf) Liveblogging Supreme Court same-sex marriage cases: What today’s rulings mean for angel investing and the startup financing ecosystem The accredited investor definition, after the Supreme Court strikes down DOMA A Story by Joe Wallin “Spouse” Abuse: Regulation D And The Defense Of Marriage (.pdf) by Ryan J. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 1:21 pm
" Yet another way to protect Reg D is the approach taken by Dan Rosen, Joe Wallin and me. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 6:01 am
In this article Bryant detailed several leadership lessons that Moritz had experienced over the years which I thought had quite a bit of application to the compliance practitioner. 10 Common Questions Regarding General Solicitation by Joe Wallin in the Startup Law Blog On September 23, 2013, startups are going to be able to generally solicit their securities offerings under Rule 506(c) of Regulation D. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:49 am
Closing Thoughts for This Morning Joe Wallin has written on this topic recently, identifying three principles he thinks any viable crowdfunding exemption should observe. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 8:56 pm
Joe Wallin’s blog gives a great overview of Rule 701 as well. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:09 am
Help to SaveRegD.com A site has been launched - by Joe Wallin and Bill Carleton - to push back on Congress keeping this Section in final legislation - see "SaveRegD.com. [read post]
18 May 2011, 4:18 pm
Garry Fujita Joe Wallin [1]There is another interesting side note to this legislation, resulting in U.S. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:09 am
Joe Wallin of Davis Wright Tremaine reports that Senators Bond, Warner, Brown and Cantwell have proposed an amendment (#4037) to the Dodd bill that would: - Remove the ridiculous and industry killing 120-day wait period - Remove the "go back in time" provision, which would have re-adjusted the accredited investor financial thresholds in a way that would have wiped out 2/3rds of existing angel investors qualifying as "accredited investors" - Exclude the… [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 9:15 am
123, or 62%, of the 2010 AmLaw 200 law firms are now blogging. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 10:18 am
96, or 48%, of the 2009 AmLaw 200 law firms are now blogging. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 10:18 am
96, or 48%, of the 2009 AmLaw 200 law firms are now blogging. [read post]
