Search for: "John Does I-VII"
Results 101 - 120
of 401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2020, 9:30 pm
At it, I summarized the book. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:26 am
While McConnell is not mentioned in the Constitution, Chief Justice John Roberts is. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 1:12 pm
I am telling you what I have seen in the Father’s presence, and you are doing what you have heard from your father. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 8:18 am
When it does, Chief Justice John Roberts will preside. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
They found it in Chief Justice John Roberts, who had been a dissenter in the Texas case three years ago. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm
Rule VII empowers the Chief Justice to decide these questions himself unless a senator asks for a vote on whether to overrule him (in which case the Senate votes without debate). [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Including such conduct within the scope of Title VII is less a reductio ad absurdum than it is a parade of horribles without any floats.What If I Agree With Jareb’s Resolution? [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:58 am
Texas: The rationale of Bowers does not withstand careful analysis. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts interjects: “And maybe we’d have an opportunity to hear the three answers. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 2:44 pm
I. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
“I can’t help preferring champagne to ditch water — I doubt if the universe does. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
If John is fired for dating Michael, and he would not have been fired if he were a woman, then John is fired because of his sex. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:54 pm
Justice Elena Kagan does just that, asserting that Bursch is making Title VII about groups instead of individuals. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 2:07 pm
Finally, Roberts devotes several minutes to paying tribute to the late retired Justice John Paul Stevens, who died July 16 at age 99. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 5:57 am
For these reasons, Hadi requested to be sent back to Camp VII. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:07 am
American Humanist Association, in which the court held that a large cross honoring World War I veterans on public land in Maryland does not the violate Constitution’s bar on establishing religion, “shift the Supreme Court’s decisions permitting prayer before state legislative sessions and town council meetings from the periphery of Establishment Clause jurisprudence to the core—seemingly allowing the exception for longstanding historical practice to swallow… [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:30 am
Hodges (Chief Justice John Roberts, dissenting). [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm
Does the NSC staff consistently over-reach—and does its overreaching tend to produce worse national security outcomes? [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 10:33 am
” I predict that these four justices – and perhaps Chief Justice John Roberts – want to reconsider and overrule Employment Division v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:42 am
American Humanist Association, upholding a World War I memorial cross against an establishment clause challenge. [read post]
