Search for: "John Smith v. Attorney General United States" Results 101 - 120 of 329
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2007, 10:11 pm
Seth at Quizlaw tells us that; Section 6103 of Title V of the United States Code reads, in relevant part: (a) The following are legal public holidays: … Memorial Day, the las [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall hailed Smith’s excruciating last minutes on Earth as “humane” and reflecting a “historic” breakthrough. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
From Japan to the United States and beyond, karaoke is wildly popular. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am by Wells Bennett
Klayman tells the panel that he doesn’t trust the United States’ explanation for his clie [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
Sixteen state attorneys general have filed an amicus brief supporting the petition. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood provides useless blather to accompany Monday’s relists. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 10:17 am by William Ford
” In preparation for oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
Smith that the free exercise clause generally requires no religious exemptions from laws that are neutral and generally applicable. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
* The IPKat weblog and the European Patent Office: some points of clarificationMerpel and you need to talk.* Offering a service is not use in commerce Under Lanham Act, says Federal Circuit Court Blogger and recent guest Kat Marie-Andrée Weiss explains the ruling in David Couture v Playdom, a Federal Circuit's decision that highlights a difference of approach between the trade mark law of the United States and that of the European Union as regards the… [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 4:14 pm by Tyler Giannini and Susan Farbstein
The young United States did not wish to harbor a pirate or slave trader considered the enemy of all mankind. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak)   United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak)   United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
' Court of Appeal rules... - Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Mark Walsh
Bursch, a special assistant attorney general of Michigan defending the state bans, says at one point. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
United States, 10-9746 (ditto); and Wesevich v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:21 am by RobKornfeld
John Clifford Moore, Attorney at Law, Maple Valley, Robert Craig Levin, Mitchell Lang & Smith, Seattle, for Respondent. [read post]