Search for: "John Want, III" Results 101 - 120 of 1,301
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2006, 12:48 pm
"  Marty Lederman responds:The reason John and his colleagues are so spooked by the prospect of judicial review is that they want the President to be able to act in accord with very radical and questionable legal interpretations, without any risk that anyone will ever call them on it. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:21 pm
By Mike Dorf Much of the attention in DC over the last few days has turned to John McCain's efforts to prevent Susan Rice from becoming Secretary of State--apparently so that the post can go to his fellow failed Presidential candidate, John Kerry. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 3:38 am by Anthea Roberts
By Anthea Roberts and Taylor St John In UNCITRAL, states have broken through the impasse of the incrementalist and systemic reformer camps. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:00 am by Karim Benyekhlef and Nicolas Vermeys
Ourselves, and others (mainly John Gregory), have reported and commented on these rules on multiple prior occasions, but as time goes on, the major question surrounding said rules is less and less “what should they say”, and more and more “why bother”. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 12:41 pm by Sandy Levinson
  It is an unfortunate truth, which Bruni seems to want to deny, that politicians are always thinking of consequences, including messy ones like the future of their own seats (I'll bet that the various presidential prospects are thinking of Hillary Clinton and John Kerry in 2002 and want desperately not to repeat their mistakes) or the broader future, as with the likelihood that Obama will turn out to be the best friend that Rand Paul could possibly dream of. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 8:44 am by Ronald Mann
On that point, the strongest view came from Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 12:08 pm by Fred Abrams
II) THE JOHN DOE SUMMONSES Therefore, In The Matter Of The Tax Liabilities Of John Does, prosecutors argued in court that the IRS needed John Doe summonses. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 2:18 am by familoo
  Part III of the Family Law Act 1996 began to push at the door by requiring those who wanted public funding to at least consider the prospect of mediation (as re-stated in the Access to Justice Act 1999). [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm by Guest Author
Corner Post wants the Federal Reserve to impose more stringent regulation on all banks, not only on banks that do business with Corner Post. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Favoritism, bias, and retaliation are woven into the heart of American politics, and the Court does not want the net of criminal liability to be stretched that broadly. [read post]
7 May 2008, 5:06 pm
The courts (that's the Article III courts that would adjudicate this issue, presumably including, eventually, the U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 1:53 pm by NCC Staff
John Malcolm is Director of the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, and the Ed Gilbertson and Sherry Lindberg Gilbertson Senior Legal Fellow, at the Heritage Foundation. [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:18 pm by David Garcia and Helen C. Eckert
  In a decisive and strongly-worded opinion, the Honorable John Jones III of the Middle District of Pennsylvania concluded that (1) the FTC had fatally alleged an unrealistically narrow geographic market; and (2) the merger was likely to benefit (not harm) consumers, in part by allowing the merged entity to remain competitive in the new healthcare environment which “virtually compels” consolidations. [read post]