Search for: "Johns v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 22,271
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2024, 11:11 am by Guest Blogger
  Like Joseph Story in his 1842 decision in Prigg v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 9:49 am by Scott Bomboy
On July 2, 2024, John Broomes, United States District Judge for the District of Kansas, issued an injunction against the final Title IX rule. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:41 am by Josh Blackman
His resignation came shortly after the Supreme Court unanimously decided United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by JB
Hasen, Election Meltdown: Dirty Tricks, Distrust, and the Threat to American Democracy (Yale University Press, 2020).2019December 14, 2019Balkinization Symposium on Mary Anne Franks, The Cult of the Constitution (Stanford University Press, 2019).December 6, 2019Balkinization Symposium on  David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 6:10 am by Norman L. Eisen
John Sauer, “So you concede that private acts don’t get immunity? [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:14 pm by Steven Calabresi
The size of the Supreme Court did increase from 6 justices at the founding, to 7 and then 9, before 1861, as the population and number of states in the union increased exponentially. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 12:52 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2]respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 11:52 am by Scott Bomboy
In April 1841, Vice President John Tyler was summoned to Washington after the death of President William Henry Harrison. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
  As LaCroix later explains, this consensus “held that slavery was a local matter, that the states alone could regulate it, and that therefore the U.S. government lacked authority over slavery in the states” (216). [read post]