Search for: "Jonathan Janes" Results 101 - 120 of 277
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2018, 1:29 pm by NELB Staff
Jane Esberg (Stanford University) and Jonathan Mummolo (Princeton University) have posted "Explaining Misperceptions of Crime" on SSRN. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 8:03 am by Andrew Hamm
Judge Kavanaugh and the environment, by Michael Livermore, University of Virginia School of Law Judge Kavanaugh on abortion: Rehnquist as “judicial hero” and the case of Jane Doe, by Amy Howe, Howe on the Court Kavanaugh on the Affordable Care Act: Seven-Sky v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm by Bridget Crawford
Hill ProfJulieHill Alabama       Shalini Ray shalbharg Alabama immigration professional responsibility civil procedure Adam Steinman Adam_Steinman Alabama       Joyce Vance joycewhitevance Alabama Criminal Law/Procedure Criminal Justice Reform, Civil Rights   Robert Heverly robheverly Albany       Sarah Rogerson RogersonSarah Albany       Tim Caulfield CaulfieldTim Alberta       Peter Sankoff petersankoff Alberta  … [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 2:17 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Jane Esberg and Jonathan Mummolo (Stanford University and Princeton University) have posted Explaining Misperceptions of Crime on SSRN. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Because then-Judge Roberts’s wife, Jane Sullivan Roberts, had served on the Board of Feminists For Life (FFL) for a number of years, I decided to examine the case for opposing abortion rights on feminist grounds. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 6:14 am
Posted by Abena Mainoo, Elizabeth (Lisa) Vicens, and Jonathan S. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:05 am by Steve Lubet
The Top 10 list quickly becomes mundane in any era, so contemporary Matthews and Jonathans will soon enough lament the difficulty of distinguishing themselves from all of the other little Matthews and Jonathans bouncing around on today's playgrounds. [read post]
13 May 2018, 2:30 pm by David Lat
[Bench Memos / National Review] * If you're an older lawyer and "in transition," you need to get yourself a "temporary identity," as Jane Genova explains. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 6:30 am
  Since representing Jane, we’ve been back in court on behalf of other young women – other “Janes. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 8:20 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Judge Jane Stranch dissented, joined by Judges Cole, Moore, and Donald, arguing that existing Sixth Amendment jurisprudence allows for a more fact-specific analysis and the conclustion that the defendant's right to counsel did attach pre-indictment, at least in this case. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
The Regulatory Review is pleased to highlight the top fifty pieces of 2017 authored by The Regulatory Review staff contributors. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Federalist Society Review,  Jonathan Wood and Ilya Shapiro weigh in on Christie v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:27 am by Jonathan H. Adler
  Clack’s co-authors, who include Ken Caldeira, David Victor and Jane Long, while identified in the complaint were not named as defendants in the suit. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 5:00 am by Jim Sedor
In September 2015, Heastie announced that Jane Feldman, a respected former top ethics official in Colorado, would lead the office. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 11:44 am by Jane Bambauer
As Jonathan Rauch neatly explains, it requires adherence to just two simple rules: First, no claim, no matter how absurd, unconventional, or unpopular, can be removed from consideration. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 5:32 pm by Jane Bambauer
Regular Volokh conspirator Jonathan Adler has taken up the issue of compelled informational speech in his work, which has been influential in my thinking. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 4:30 am by Alex Potcovaru
  Benjamin Wittes Wittes and Jonathan Rauch highlighted their new paper arguing for less populism and more expertise in the political system. [read post]