Search for: "Jones v. Jones et al"
Results 101 - 120
of 645
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
Clayton County, Georgia, No. 17-1618, and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 10:51 pm
Avanci et al. in San Jose and the German Nokia v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 12:16 am
In a new decision last week, State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
Industrial Service Solutions, et al., Case No. 18-30136 (5th Cir., April 19, 2019). [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
Industrial Service Solutions, et al., Case No. 18-30136 (5th Cir., April 19, 2019). [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 1:27 pm
HOOBRAJH et al – United States District Court – Western District of Pennsylvania – May 30th, 2019) involves a trucking accident. [read post]
24 May 2019, 7:16 am
Boomershine et al. v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
NURSES YOLANDA LOPEZ ET AL McAllen Hospitals, L.P. v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:20 am
Jones . . . and regarding cell phone searches incident to arrest in Riley v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 6:02 am
Boomershine et al. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
California Bound: Slavery on the New Frontier, an exhibit curated by Tyree Boyd-Pates and Taylor Bythewood-Porter, is at the California African American Museum in Los Angeles through April 28.I'm grateful to Virginia Law's Aditya Bamzai for posting his amicus brief in PDR Network et al. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 8:49 am
Marquette Transportation Company, LLC, et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Louisiana – April 11th, 2019) comes forth from injuries allegedly sustained by the plaintiff when he slipped and fell on the deck of the M/V Steve Richoux, which is owned and operated by the defendant. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:10 am
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KZ6687 .C37 2018Stuart Casey-Maslen et al., Drones and Other Unmanned Weapons Systems Under International Law (Leiden: Brill, Nijhoff, 2018). [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 7:42 am
Facts: This case (Jones v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Ville de Montréal (Service de police de la Ville de Montréal), 2018 QCCS 5639 [23] En raison de la position prise par la Ville de Montréal dès le début du dossier et de son comportement depuis, la présente demande en irrecevabilité est manifestement mal fondée, déraisonnable et abusive au sens de l’article 54 C.p.c.[11]. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 9:35 am
Amy Jones et al to stand. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:03 am
LaFave, et al., Criminal Procedure § 19.2(e) (4th ed. 2015). [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized employee… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized employee… [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
