Search for: "Jones v. King*" Results 101 - 120 of 562
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2018, 1:33 pm by Alfred Brophy
On Friday January 19 the University of Pennsylvania Law School will host a symposium on Reparations, as the 37th annual Edward V. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
  However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:32 am by Russ Bensing
  The current view of what constitutes a search or seizure under the 4th Amendment was articulated in 1968 in Katz v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
The threshold of seriousness Master Bell reflected upon two notable cases, Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] QB 946 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] 1 WLR 1985. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
Jones, to follow the law as I give it to you? [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
Jones.* Down the Tubes: H&M Breached Settlement Agreement by Infringing PatentJani analyses Stretchline Intellectual Properties Ltd v H&M Hennes & Mauritz UK Ltd [2015] EWHC 3298 (Pat), a decision that dealt with a UK patent concerning the tubular fabric in underwired garments such as brassieres.* Goodbye, good luck! [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 5:58 am
Supreme Court's January 2007 decision in Jones v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm by Caroline Lee
Jones sets up the question, but neither Jones nor the relevant history provides much in the way of answers.17 The Court subsequently applied Jones in Florida v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm by Josh Blackman
Boehner (R-Ohio ) in Washington on Oct. 27, 2015. ( Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg) In House of Representatives v. [read post]