Search for: "Jones v. Natural Essentials, Inc." Results 101 - 120 of 125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
May 14, 2007) (holding limitation of liability clause in alarm contract limiting recovery to $250 is valid); Jones v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm by Adam Thierer
”[13] McChesney and Nichols seem to be building on the approach popularized by Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein in their highly influential 2008 book Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness.[14] Based on behavioral economics studies, Thaler and Sunstein argue that both government and private actors must inevitably make decisions about “choice architecture” and that, by setting defaults, incentives and rules smartly, “choice architects” can and… [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 9:09 am by Fred Goldsmith
Maddux claimed Maersk Line, Limited Honeywell Technology Solutions, Inc. are vicariously liable for his injuries pursuant to the Jones Act, the Public Vessels Act, the Suits in Admiralty Act and the general maritime law of the United States, or alternatively Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
The Legal Aid Society; Real Estate Board of New York; New York State Tenants & Neighbors Coalition, Inc. et al.; Community Housing Improvement Program of New York Inc. et al.; Maria del Carmen Arroyo et al.; Rent Stabilization Association of New York City, Inc.; Office of Manhattan Borough President; Urban Justice Center; Mitchell-Lama Residents Coalition, amici curiae. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
The other day we - allegedly belatedly - posted about the Supreme Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
On the day the plan was announced, the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 4.6%.[5] On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (the “Stimulus Act”), which provides $787 billion in government spending and tax cuts and also codifies (and in some cases expands) the Treasury Department’s restrictions on executive compensation.[6] Under the Stimulus Act, recipients of TARP funds must eliminate incentives that encourage… [read post]