Search for: "Joseph May v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 1,445
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2023, 10:15 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
Alternatively, the alien can be “paroled,” i.e., released into the United States on conditions pending resolution of his application. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
President Joseph R. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 5:31 am by Ryan Merkley
In the United States, the fair use doctrine allows the exploitation of a copyrighted work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 5:48 pm by Michael Lowe
Created by the Sentencing Reform Act found within the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, the Supreme Court of the United States approved its authority in Mistretta v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm by Maggie Pahl
Army Corps of Engineers the power to regulate the “discharge of dredged and fill material to the waters of the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 8:57 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
SUSA’s software was hacked; and that SUSA had been banned from participating in prior elections in the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
  To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:14 pm by Michael Lowe
  For instance, the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 9 of the Texas Constitution both protect against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 2:35 pm by Rob Robinson
”[8] This text states that a corporation’s cooperation with the government’s investigation is a mitigating factor by which a corporation can gain credit. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:05 pm by Henry Miller
United States as evidence that members of the Court may soon revive their use of the nondelegation doctrine. [read post]