Search for: "Judith A Miller" Results 101 - 120 of 297
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
North American Indian Law: A Basic Bibliography (PDF) Patrick S. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
In the Courts The libel trial in the case of Miller v Associated Newspapers was heard on 21 to 25 May 2012 before Sharp J, sitting without a jury. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am by INFORRM
Next week in the courts On Monday 21 May 2012 the libel trial of Miller v Associated Newspapers will begin before Sharp J, sitting without a jury. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:43 pm by Ted Folkman
… Simply put, the obligation to provide evidence applies to journalists and their sources [citing the Judith Miller case]. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:27 pm by interns
” And this op-ed by Richard Clarke, Judith Miller, and R.P. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 6:48 am
"A High-Tech War on Leaks": In the Sunday Review section of this past Sunday's edition of The New York Times, Adam Liptak had a news analysis that begins, "Back in 2006, before the Obama administration made leak prosecutions routine, a panel of three federal appeals court judges in New York struggled to decide whether a prosecutor should be allowed to see the phone records of two New York Times reporters, Judith Miller and Philip Shenon, in an effort to… [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 3:30 am by Jerry Brito and Tate Watkins
Yet similar to Judith Miller’s Iraq WMD reporting, the only sources for the article’s claim that infrastructure has been compromised are anonymous U.S. intelligence officials. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 5:43 pm by Ted Folkman
There is arguably a reporter’s privilege, but its scope is unclear and probably narrower than it once was—remember the Plame Affair, in which New York Times reporter Judith Miller was found in contempt of court after a court held that she had no privilege to refuse to disclose the identity of the person who leaked information about Valerie Plame’s role as a CIA officer in response to a grand jury subpoena? [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Last week was Week 6 of the Leveson evidence hearings. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 5:01 am by David Rodman
Judith Richards Hope, members of the Board of Directors since 1989, are the longest tenured directors. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Second, it seems to me that if Judith Miller didn’t prevail in the Valerie Plame affair, then Boston College shouldn’t prevail here. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:01 pm by Ted Folkman
We don’t yet know how the judge will come down on the merits, and the fact that he was willing to give heightened considerations to BC’s arguments, after the Judith Miller case, should give Moloney and McIntyre some comfort. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The same judge made the judgment in Miller v Associated Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 2677 (QB)) available last week. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Mike Scarcella
Miller, however, declined further comment about the status of the civil case. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 11:05 pm by Lovechilde
We haven't seen national security commentary with so little credibility since Judith Miller interviewed "Curveball. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Last week was once again dominated by the Leveson Inquiry, with oral evidence from a variety of high profile figures: some famous for their role in entertainment and sport; others thrown into the limelight by traumatic circumstances. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
“The press provides an essential check on all aspects of public life,” were Lord Justice Leveson’s opening words to his Inquiry last Monday. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am by INFORRM
There was further hearing in the case of Miller v Associated Newspapers before Tugendhat J on 11 November 2011 On the same day there was a hearing in private before Eady J in the case of CTB v News Group Newspapers. [read post]