Search for: "Just v. Chambers"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,574
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
On 31 July 2023, the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) refused permission to appeal against the sentences of two Just Stop Oil protestors who scaled the bridge at the Dartford crossing, R. v Trowland & Anor [2023] EWCA Crim 919. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am
However, just as the rain falls on the just and unjust alike, the legal principles that govern tester standing do not take into account whether it is used for the public good or misused for private profit. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:58 am
" In Powell v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
When examining whether mass surveillance measures are necessary and proportionate under Article 8 ECHR, the European Court of Human Rights has focused its review on whether appropriate safeguards against government abuse exist.While the Court has not recently carried out a balancing exercise between the benefits sought by mass surveillance and its impact on society, the Grand Chamber judgment from S. and Marper v. the U.K., a case in which the Court found unanimously that the… [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
"But that's just not happening. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:03 pm
Griggs v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 4:57 am
OPPO/OPPO v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:45 am
appeared first on Just Security. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 12:21 pm
Just a formal set of rules about finality and such. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 4:44 pm
The full judgement (Smith v Backhouse [2023] [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
SB 261 would embrace a considerably larger universe than the proposed SEC rules because it would cover all large companies, not just the public reporting ones under the SEC’s jurisdiction.[16] Most U.S. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
The Court has just shifted in how it evaluates those questions. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:18 pm
(For those not familiar with Davidoff, let us just say that he and ABC Estates have not got a good reputation – more reading and more.) [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
We had a comment on the Chamber decision in 2021. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:56 am
In Biden v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:09 pm
Did she just skip over those pages? [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 4:15 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
The FTC’s proposal is just one of a number of recent examples of federal antitrust regulators focusing on the intersection of competition and labor. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm
The post Justice Stevens's Papers Reveal How The Fortune Cookies Were Baked In <I>Lawrence v. [read post]
