Search for: "Justice v. Stevens et al" Results 101 - 120 of 348
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 12:47 pm
Justice Stevens, giving the majority opinion, wrote:"Although NFL teams have common interests such as promoting the NFL brand, they are still separate, profit-maximizing entities, and their interests in licensing team trademarks are not necessarily aligned. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:44 am by Erin Miller
” Opinion below (8th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners’ reply Amicus brief of Georgetown University et al. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 12:14 pm
The final two-parts will address Justice Stevens epic concurring opinion next week.Bilksi et al v Kappos (2010)Last Monday after weeks and months of waiting, the US Supreme Court issued their decision in Bilski ruling that business method patents were patentable, just not this one. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:36 am by Lyle Denniston
The case that the Court did not act upon Monday is Kiyemba, et al., v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm by Lyle Denniston
At 10 a.m. next Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on Mayo Collaborative Services, et al., v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm by Lyle Denniston
At 10 a.m. next Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on Mayo Collaborative Services, et al., v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:20 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
The Supreme Court rendered its much-anticipated decision in Graham County Soil and Water Conservation District, et al. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:43 pm by Old Fox
Sanders, Stuart Smalley, Tim Harken, Chuckie Schumer, et al. be so angry about it? [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 12:49 pm by Lyle Denniston
  (The case is Mohammed, et al., v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 4:06 pm
The application was 06A678, Coalition to Defender Affirmative Action, et al., v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
 Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 8:35 am by David Post
(David Post) As I’ve noted before on a number of occasions, a possible landmark copyright case is now before the 2d Circuit, Viacom et al. v. [read post]